Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: a systematic literature review

The number of disabled students is rapidly increasing worldwide, but many schools and universities have failed to keep up with their learning needs. Consequently, large numbers of disabled students are dropping out of school or university. Open Educational Resources (OER) and Open Educational Practices (OEP) contain several relevant features, including the possibility of reusing and remixing, which have led researchers to consider using OER and OEP to facilitate meeting the needs of disabled and functional-diverse students in order to increase their accessibility and e-inclusion capabilities in educational settings. The very limited research to date, however, has provided a limited holistic understanding of accessibility within OER and OEP in order to aid researchers in pursuing future directions in this field. Therefore, this paper systematically reviewed 31 papers to provide insights about functional diversity within OER and OEP. The results obtained highlighted that accessibility is still in its infancy within OER and that researchers should focus more on considering the four accessibility principles — perceivable, operable, understandable and robust — when providing OER. Additionally, while several researchers have focused on several issues related to accessibility within OER, limited focus has been given to assistive technologies using OER. Finally, this paper provides several recommendations to increase accessibility within OER and help design more accessible OER for students with functional diversity.

[1]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[2]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  How Could MOOCs Become Accessible? The Case of edX and the Future of Inclusive Online Learning , 2016, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[3]  W. Frontera.  The world report on disability. , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  Regina Motz,et al.  Do we have accessible oer repositories? , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE).

[5]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  User Experience for Disabled Users in Open Educational Resources Websites , 2015 .

[6]  Shih-Chih Chen,et al.  RECENT RELATED RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2012, Australian Journal of Business and Management Research.

[7]  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ascaso,et al.  OLA! A Scenario-Based Approach to Enhance Open Learning Through Accessibility , 2016, ICCHP.

[8]  Silvia Baldiris,et al.  Cocreation and Evaluation of Inclusive and Accessible Open Educational Resources: A Mapping Toward the IMS Caliper , 2016, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje.

[9]  Un Desa.  Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[10]  Maria Gelastopoulou,et al.  Multimodal Accessibility for Deaf Students Using Interactive Video, Digital Repository and Hybrid Books , 2016, HCI.

[11]  Ronghuai Huang,et al.  Open Educational Resources and Practices in China: A Systematic Literature Review , 2019, Sustainability.

[12]  D. R. Ingram.  The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form , 1971 .

[13]  Francisco Iniesto,et al.  Strategies for improving the level of accessibility in the design of MOOC-based learning services , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE).

[14]  Rosa Navarrete,et al.  OER-based learning and people with disabilities , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative and Blended Learning (ICBL).

[15]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .

[16]  Mohamed Jemni,et al.  Automatic modeling learner’s personality using learning analytics approach in an intelligent Moodle learning platform , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[17]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Improving OER websites for learners with disabilities , 2016, W4A.

[18]  Maiga Chang,et al.  Smart learning environments , 2015 .

[19]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Metadata in Open Educational Resources websites: a review from the perspective of disabled users' requirements , 2014 .

[20]  Francisco Iniesto,et al.  Accessibility assessment of MOOC platforms in Spanish: UNED COMA, COLMENIA and Miriada X , 2014, 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE).

[21]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  Auditing the Accessibility of MOOCs: A Four-Component Approach , 2019, EC-TEL.

[22]  Bulent Gursel Emiroglu,et al.  Through efficient use of LORs: Prospective teachers' views on operational aspects of learning object repositories , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Web accessibility of MOOCs for elderly students , 2013, 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[24]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning , 2016 .

[25]  Jennifer Pérez,et al.  A framework for improving web accessibility and usability of Open Course Ware sites , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Thomas F. Oltmanns,et al.  Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology , 2009, Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment.

[27]  Andrina Granic,et al.  Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[28]  David C. Yen,et al.  Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 - A comparative study based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Taiwan , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Bridging the accessibility gap in Open Educational Resources , 2017, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[30]  Sandra Sanchez-Gordon,et al.  An ecosystem for corporate training with accessible MOOCs and OERs , 2015, 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE).

[31]  Cecilia Avila,et al.  INTRODUCING THE INCLUSIVE LEARNING HANDBOOK: AN OER FOR TEACHERS AND POLICY MAKERS , 2014 .

[32]  Martin Weller,et al.  Battle for Open , 2014 .

[33]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research , 2010 .

[34]  Wolfgang Klas,et al.  A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability , 2010, CSUR.

[35]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  What are the Expectations of Disabled Learners when Participating in a MOOC? , 2017, L@S.

[36]  Rosa Navarrete,et al.  Evaluating findability of open educational resources from the perspective of users with disabilities: a preliminary approach , 2015, 2015 Second International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG).

[37]  Paloma Martínez,et al.  Evaluating the accessibility of three open‐source learning content management systems: A comparative study , 2014, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[38]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  White Paper: promoting Design for All and e-Accessibility in Europe , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[39]  Jordán Pascual Espada,et al.  Social4all: Definition of specific adaptations in Web applications to improve accessibility , 2016, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[40]  Germania Rodriguez Morales,et al.  Towards a reference software architecture for improving the accessibility and usability of open course ware , 2017, ECSA.

[41]  Francisco Iniesto,et al.  Accessibility analysis in MOOC platforms. A case study: UNED COMA and UAbiMOOC , 2014 .

[42]  Mohamed Jemni,et al.  Towards accessible open educational resources: Overview and challenges , 2017, 2017 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA).

[43]  Lucia Ferlino,et al.  Accessibility of Educational Software: A Problem Still to Be Solved , 2009, USAB.

[44]  Francisco Iniesto,et al.  YourMOOC4all: A MOOCs Inclusive Design and Useful Feedback Research Project , 2018, 2018 Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS).

[45]  Cecilia Avila Garzon,et al.  Tracing the creation and evaluation of accessible Open Educational Resources through learning analytics , 2018 .

[46]  Sindile A Ngubane-Mokiwa,et al.  Accessibility Strategies for Making MOOCs for People with Visual impairments: A Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Perspective , 2016 .

[47]  Marjo Virnes,et al.  Robotics in special needs education , 2008, IDC.

[48]  Dave Catlin,et al.  Designing Robots for Special Needs Education , 2018, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[49]  Donal Fitzpatrick,et al.  EnhAnced government learning portal: Production of universally accessible open educational resources , 2016, 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC).

[50]  Ulf-Daniel Ehlers,et al.  Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. , 2011 .

[51]  Panagiotis Zervas,et al.  An Online Educational Portal for Supporting Open Access to Teaching and Learning of People with Disabilities , 2014, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[52]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Towards an Accessible UX for People with Disabilities in Open Educational Resources Websites , 2019, AHFE.

[53]  Vassilis Kourbetis,et al.  Accessible Open Educational Resources for Students with Disabilities in Greece: They are Open to the Deaf , 2014, HCI.

[54]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.