Quality in point-of-care testing

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is an increasingly popular means of providing laboratory testing at or near to the site of patient care. POCT provides rapid results and has the potential to improve patient outcome from earlier treatment. However, a faster result is not necessarily an equivalent result to traditional, core laboratory testing. Preanalytic, analytic and postanalytic factors can influence the quality of POCT and lead to misinterpretation. Concerns over the quality of POCT have resulted in a hierarchy of laboratory regulations in the USA and POCT guidelines are appearing in a number of countries worldwide. Quality POCT must control every aspect of the test and testing process that can affect the ultimate result. Laboratory quality regulations are very similar to industrial quality requirements and POCT can be viewed like any manufacturing business where the product being produced is the test result. Use of industrial management techniques, such as failure mode and effects analysis, can be applied to POCT to isolate and reduce the sources of testing error. Data management is fundamental to quality. Analyzing POCT data can show quality trends before they affect the result. Newer POCT devices have computerized data capture and storage functions that can collect the key information at the time the test is performed and later transmit that data to a POCT data manager or hospital information system. Recent standards, such as the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards POCT1-A, provide a connectivity standard to allow different POCT devices to share a common interface and data manager system, reducing the cost of implementing and maintaining POCT. Guaranteeing POCT quality is resource-intensive and as healthcare budgets get tighter and staffing shortages grow, patient outcome must be weighed against available resources to determine optimum testing strategies. Use of the POCT literature can help establish an evidence-based justification to support POCT.

[1]  G R Bickford.  Decentralized testing in the 1990s. A survey of United States hospitals. , 1994, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[2]  R. Rizza,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose , 1994 .

[3]  Leonard Steinborn.  International Organization for Standardization ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems — Requirements , 2004 .

[4]  H. Schlebusch,et al.  Recommendations of the German Working Group on Medical Laboratory Testing (AML) on the Introduction and Quality Assurance of Procedures for Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) in Hospitals , 1999, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[5]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[6]  J I Morrison,et al.  Managing bedside glucose testing in the hospital. , 1987, JAMA.

[7]  F. Kocka,et al.  The urometer as a reservoir of infectious organisms. , 1977, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  B. Pau,et al.  Reliability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests: laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  R H Laessig,et al.  Point-of-care testing technology. Is quality control still relevant? , 1997, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[10]  J M Hicks.  Home testing: to do or not to do? , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  A M Summerton,et al.  The use of desk-top cholesterol analysers in general practice. , 1995, Public health.

[12]  James H. Nichols.  Management of Remote Laboratory Data , 2001 .

[13]  R H Laessig,et al.  Electronic "Quality Control" (EQC): is it just for unit use devices? , 2001, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[14]  Emery J. Stephans,et al.  Point-of-Care Connectivity Standard: Progress in Compliance , 2003 .

[15]  P. Raskin,et al.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[16]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Enterobacter cloacae in a neonatal intensive care unit: account of an outbreak and its relationship to use of third generation cephalosporins. , 1994, The Journal of hospital infection.

[17]  Webster,et al.  Webster's II New College Dictionary , 1999 .

[18]  James H. Nichols.  Point-of-Care Testing : Performance Improvement and Evidence-Based Outcomes , 2002 .

[19]  Mary L. Doshi,et al.  Accuracy of Consumer Performed In-Home Tests for Early Pregnancy Detection , 1987 .

[20]  Clinical laboratory performance on proficiency testing samples--United States, 1994. , 1996, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[21]  R H Laessig,et al.  Regulatory requirements (CLIA '88, JCAHO, CAP) for decentralized testing. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs; laboratory requirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final rule. , 2003, Federal register.

[23]  B. Seamonds.  Medical, economic, and regulatory factors affecting point-of-care testing. A report of the conference on factors affecting point-of-care testing, Philadelphia, PA 6-7 May 1994. , 1996, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[24]  J Greyson.  Quality Control in Patient Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1993, Diabetes Care.

[25]  B M Goldsmith.  New POCT (point-of-care testing) guide establishes testing uniformity. , 1995, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[26]  W A Rutala,et al.  Serratia marcescens nosocomial infections of the urinary tract associated with urine measuring containers and urinometers. , 1981, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  C P Price,et al.  Extra‐laboratory Blood Glucose Measurement: A Policy Statement , 1988, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.