A Simple Method for Validation and Verification of Pipettes Mounted on Automated Liquid Handlers

We have implemented a simple, inexpensive, and fast procedure for validation and verification of the performance of pipettes mounted on automated liquid handlers (ALHs) as necessary for laboratories accredited under ISO 17025. A six- or seven-step serial dilution of OrangeG was prepared in quadruplicates in a flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plate, manually using calibrated pipettes. Each pipette of the liquid handler (1–8) dispensed a selected volume (1–200μL) of OrangeG eight times into the wells of the microtiter plate. All wells contained a total of 200μL liquid. The absorbance was read, and the dispensed volume of each pipette was calculated based on a plot of volume and absorbance of a known set of OrangeG dilutions. Finally, the percent inaccuracy (%d) and the imprecision (%CV) of each pipette were calculated. Using predefined acceptance criteria, each pipette was then either approved or failed. Failed pipettes were either repaired or the volume deviation was compensated for by applying a calibration curve in the liquid-handler software. We have implemented the procedure on a Sias Xantus, an MWGt The ONYX, four Tecan Freedom EVO, a Biomek NX Span-8, and four Biomek 3000 robots, and the methods are freely available. In conclusion, we have set up a simple, inexpensive, and fast solution for the continuous validation of ALHs used for accredited work according to the ISO 17025 standard. The method is easy to use for aqueous solutions but requires a spectrophotometer that can read microtiter plates.

[1]  Ejvor Sassarinis Jansson,et al.  Hand and shoulder ailments among laboratory technicians using modern plunger-operated pipettes. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Tanya R. Knaide,et al.  Rapid Volume Verification in High-Density Microtiter Plates Using Dual-Dye Photometry , 2006 .

[3]  Jianhui Sun,et al.  Photocatalytic degradation of Orange G on nitrogen-doped TiO2 catalysts under visible light and sunlight irradiation. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Iris H Xie,et al.  Automated calibration of TECAN genesis liquid handling workstation utilizing an online balance and density meter. , 2004, Assay and drug development technologies.

[5]  Tanya R. Knaide,et al.  Multichannel Verification System (MVS): A Dual-Dye Ratiometric Photometry System for Performance Verification of Multichannel Liquid Delivery Devices , 2005 .

[6]  Paul B Taylor,et al.  A Standard Operating Procedure for Assessing Liquid Handler Performance in High-Throughput Screening , 2002, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[7]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[8]  Heidrun Rhode,et al.  An Improved Method for Checking HTS/uHTS Liquid-Handling Systems , 2004, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[9]  Tanya R. Knaide,et al.  Verifying Liquid-Handler Performance for Complex or Nonaqueous Reagents: A New Approach , 2006 .

[10]  Bodo Mickan,et al.  Volume calibration of 1000 μl micropipettes. Inter-laboratory comparison , 2008 .