The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy.

The study of the face and the ability to alter its form have fascinated mankind for thousands of years. The clinical ability to alter dentofacial form, whether through orthodontics, facial growth modification, or surgery, requires an understanding of facial beauty, including the evaluation of facial esthetics, proportions, and symmetry. The purposes of this article were to give a brief contemporary overview of our concepts of facial beauty and esthetics and to consider a long-standing and controversial debate on the treatment of patients with dentofacial deformities.

[1]  R. Bergman,et al.  Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  C. D. Green,et al.  All That Glitters: A Review of Psychological Research on the Aesthetics of the Golden Section , 1995, Perception.

[3]  Robert M. Ricketts,et al.  A foundation for cephalometric communication , 1960 .

[4]  J. G. Martin,et al.  RACIAL ETHNOCENTRISM AND JUDGMENT OF BEAUTY. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.

[5]  C. Steiner.  Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .

[6]  F. C. Macgregor.  Social and psychological implications of dentofacial disfigurement. , 1970, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[8]  D. Zaidel,et al.  THE FACE, BEAUTY, AND SYMMETRY: PERCEIVING ASYMMETRY IN BEAUTIFUL FACES , 2005, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  L L Merrifield,et al.  The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  N. Wahl.  Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 1: Antiquity to the mid-19th century. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  Steve Jones.  Almost like a whale : the origin of species updated , 1999 .

[12]  P. White,et al.  Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  T. Wadden,et al.  Body image dissatisfaction and body dysmorphic disorder in 100 cosmetic surgery patients. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Farhad B Naini,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of the relative contribution of genetics and environment to various facial parameters with the twin method. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  R. Edler,et al.  Background Considerations to Facial Aesthetics , 2001, Journal of orthodontics.

[16]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? , 1987 .

[17]  B W Baker,et al.  The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. , 2001, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[18]  H Peck,et al.  A concept of facial esthetics. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[19]  Francis Hutcheson,et al.  An Inquiry Into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue; In Two Treatises , 1986 .

[20]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[23]  R. Ricketts.  The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[24]  F. Galton.  Composite Portraits, Made by Combining Those of Many Different Persons Into a Single Resultant Figure. , 1879 .

[25]  N M Bass,et al.  The aesthetic analysis of the face. , 1991, European journal of orthodontics.

[26]  R A Holdaway,et al.  A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[27]  A. D. Linney,et al.  The use of three-dimensional techniquesin facial esthetics , 1995 .

[28]  Roger Herz-Fischler.  A mathematical history of the golden number , 1998 .

[29]  David M. Sarver,et al.  Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity , 2002 .

[30]  Ronald W. Potter.  The Art of Measurement , 1999 .

[31]  C. Burstone,et al.  Soft-tissue profile--fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[32]  R M Ricketts,et al.  Divine proportion in facial esthetics. , 1982, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[33]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .