Validity of the Liouville-Green (or WKB) method for cochlear mechanics

This article presents a comparison of Liouville-Green (LG) calculations and exact solutions of 2- and 3-dimensional cochlea models. The agreement is in general quite good. For certain choices of the model parameters, however, the 2- and 3-dimensional LG solutions show appreciable errors in the region just beyond the location of maximum amplitude of the basilar membrane response. The origin of these errors appears to be the non-uniqueness of the (complex) LG wave number k(x) in 2- and 3-dimensional models: the 'eikonal equation' from which k(x) has to be solved has multiple roots. To study this problem somewhat deeper, the properties of the locus of k=k(x) formed when x is varied, are investigated. Erratic behaviour of the LG solution is found to occur when this root locus approaches one of the saddle points of a complex function of k- called Q(k)- which plays the major role in the eikonal equation. Apart from this specific problem, the LG approximation is very well suited to unravel the mechanisms governing wave propagation and attenuation in the cochlea. The analysis shows clearly why and how the response of the basilar membrane builds up to a maximum and which factors cause a turnover and a rapid decrease to occur, in both the long-wave and the short-wave cases. A special discussion is dedicated to the relation between the LG approximation and the absence of wave reflection in cochlea models of the type studied.

[1]  M R Schroeder,et al.  An integrable model for the basilar membrane. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E. De Boer,et al.  Short-wave world revisited: Resonance in a two-dimensional cochlear model , 1979, Hearing Research.

[3]  E. Boer Deep-water waves in the cochlea , 1980, Hearing Research.

[4]  G. Whitham,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Waves , 1976 .

[5]  L A Taber,et al.  Comparison of WKB and finite difference calculations for a two-dimensional cochlear model. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  VI – Application of the WKB Method in Solid Mechanics , 1976 .

[7]  S. Neely Finite difference solution of a two-dimensional mathematical model of the cochlea. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  E. De Boer,et al.  A cylindrical cochlea model: The bridge between two and three dimensions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[9]  Michael V Berry,et al.  Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics , 1972 .

[10]  Vimal Singh,et al.  Perturbation methods , 1991 .

[11]  L. Taber,et al.  Comparison of WKB calculations and experimental results for three-dimensional cochlear models. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. De Boer,et al.  Short waves in three-dimensional cochlea models: Solution for a ‘block’ model , 1981, Hearing Research.

[13]  James Lighthill,et al.  Energy flow in the cochlea , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  M. Sondhi,et al.  Cochlear macromechanics: time domain solutions. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  James Edward Storer,et al.  Passive network synthesis , 1957 .

[16]  J. Pierce,et al.  The cochlear compromise. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. de Boer,et al.  Solving cochlear mechanics problems with higher‐order differential equations , 1982 .

[18]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mechanics of the inner ear: A mathematical approach , 1980 .

[19]  Correspondence principle in cochlear mechanics , 1982 .

[20]  M. Lighthill,et al.  Waves In Fluids , 2002 .