Competition and the Dynamics of Group affiliation

How can we understand the interaction between the social network topology of a population and the patterns of group affiliation in that population? Each aspect influences the other: social networks provide the conduits via which groups recruit new members and groups provide the context in which new social ties are formed. Given that the resources of individuals are finite, groups can be considered to compete with one another for the time and energy of their members. Such competition is likely to have an impact on the way in which social structure and group affiliation co-evolve. While many social simulation models exhibit group formation as a part of their behaviour (e.g., opinion clusters or converged cultures), models that explicitly focus on group affiliation are less common. We describe and explore the behaviour of a model in which, distinct from most current models, individual nodes can belong to multiple groups simultaneously. By varying the capacity of individuals to belong to groups, and the costs associated with group membership, we explore the effect of different levels of competition on population structure and group dynamics.

[1]  T. A. Hsia,et al.  Heroes and Hero-Worship in Chinese Communist Fiction , 1963, The China Quarterly.

[2]  Daichi Kimura,et al.  Coevolutionary networks with homophily and heterophily. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[4]  S. Feld.  The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Edmund Chattoe.  Using simulation to develop testable functionalist explanations: a case study of church survival. , 2006, The British journal of sociology.

[6]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[7]  J. Moody.  Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[9]  C. Page,et al.  Society: An Introductory Analysis , 1951 .

[10]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Roger V. Gould.  Collective Action and Network Structure , 1993 .

[12]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[13]  Rickard Sandell,et al.  Organizational Life Aboard the Moving Bandwagons: A Network Analysis of Dropouts from a Swedish Temperance Organization, 1896-1937 , 1999 .

[14]  J. N. Edwards,et al.  Voluntary Associations and the Integration Hypothesis , 1965 .

[15]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[16]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[17]  Guobin Yang,et al.  Environmental NGOs and Institutional Dynamics in China , 2005, The China Quarterly.

[18]  M. McPherson.  An Ecology of Affiliation , 1983 .

[19]  Sheldon Ekland-Olson,et al.  Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment , 1980 .

[20]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[21]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Barrat,et al.  Consensus formation on adaptive networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[24]  M. McPherson.  A Blau space primer: prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation , 2004 .

[25]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[26]  W. Shrum.  Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .

[27]  B. Weitz.  Hosted By , 2003 .

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[30]  Jerry L. L. Miller,et al.  TESTING A DYNAMIC MODEL OF SOCIAL COMPOSITION: DIVERSITY AND CHANGE IN VOLUNTARY GROUPS* , 1996 .

[31]  Ann Dale,et al.  Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks , 2007 .

[32]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[33]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  A Rejection Mechanism in 2D Bounded Confidence Provides More Conformity , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[34]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Charlotta Stern,et al.  The Evolution of Social–Movement Organizations: Niche Competition in Social Space , 1999 .

[36]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[37]  Bernice A. Pescosolido,et al.  The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[38]  M E J Newman,et al.  Identity and Search in Social Networks , 2002, Science.

[39]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[40]  Harold A. Simon,et al.  The Human Society , 1975 .

[41]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Towards the evolution of social structure , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[42]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .