A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits

Many species in the avian order Galliformes have bare (or "fleshy") regions on their head, ranging from simple featherless regions to specialized structures such as combs or wattles. Sexual selection for these traits has been demonstrated in several species within the largest galliform family, the Phasianidae, though it has also been suggested that such traits are important in heat loss. These fleshy traits exhibit substantial variation in shape, color, location and use in displays, raising the question of whether these traits are homologous. To examine the evolution of fleshy traits, we estimated the phylogeny of galliforms using sequences from four nuclear loci and two mitochondrial regions. The resulting phylogeny suggests multiple gains and/or losses of fleshy traits. However, it also indicated that the ability to erect rapidly the fleshy traits is restricted to a single, well-supported lineage that includes species such as the wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo and ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus. The most parsimonious interpretation of this result is a single evolution of the physiological mechanisms that underlie trait erection despite the variation in color, location, and structure of fleshy traits that suggest other aspects of the traits may not be homologous.

[1]  R. Buchholz,et al.  THERMOREGULATORY ROLE OF THE UNFEATHERED HEAD AND NECK IN MALE WILD TURKEYS , 1996 .

[2]  R. Buchholz Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  E. Braun,et al.  MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PHYLOGENY AND SPECIATION IN THE TRAGOPANS , 2000 .

[4]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Phylogenetic Utility of Avian Ovomucoid Intron G: A Comparison of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Phylogenies in Galliformes , 2001 .

[5]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[6]  David P. Mindell,et al.  Homology evolving , 2001 .

[7]  E. Braun,et al.  Evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control region and cytochrome b genes and the inference of phylogenetic relationships in the avian genus Lophura (Galliformes). , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[8]  R. Kimball,et al.  Mate choice by female red junglefowl: the issues of multiple ornaments and fluctuating asymmetry , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  J. Ligon,et al.  The Evolution of Avian Breeding Systems , 1999 .

[10]  G. Hill,et al.  A simple and inexpensive chemical test for behavioral ecologists to determine the presence of carotenoid pigments in animal tissues , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  E. Braun,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[12]  D. Maddison,et al.  MacClade 4: analysis of phy-logeny and character evolution , 2003 .

[13]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[14]  E. Braun,et al.  S20-1 Supra-generic cladistics of landfowl (Order Galliformes) , 2006 .

[15]  G. Bortolotti,et al.  Carotenoid-based colouration and ultraviolet reflectance of the sexual ornaments of grouse , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  K Ikeo,et al.  Pax 6: mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  K. Holder,et al.  Context and consequences of comb displays by male rock ptarmigan , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. Höglund,et al.  Combs and sexual selection in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) , 2000 .

[19]  S. Drovetski Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[20]  Jon E. Ahlquist,et al.  Phylogeny and Classification of the Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution , 1991 .

[21]  P. Stettenheim,et al.  The Integumentary Morphology of Modern Birds—An Overview1 , 2000 .

[22]  P. Johnsgard Grouse And Quails Of North America , 1973 .

[23]  P. Eason,et al.  Colour bands, combs and coverable badges in willow ptarmigan , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  P. Johnsgard The Pheasants of the World: Biology and Natural History , 2000 .

[25]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[27]  P. Johnsgard,et al.  The quails, partridges, and francolins of the world , 1988 .

[28]  D. Mindell,et al.  Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[29]  L. M. Brodsky Ornament size influences mating success in male rock ptarmigan , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  W. A. Cox,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF THE NEW WORLD QUAIL (ODONTOPHORIDAE): EIGHT NUCLEAR LOCI AND THREE MITOCHONDRIAL REGIONS CONTRADICT MORPHOLOGY AND THE SIBLEY-AHLQUIST TAPESTRY , 2007 .

[31]  J. Crawford,et al.  Comparative displays among four species of tragopans and their derivation and function , 1998 .

[32]  A. Mooers,et al.  Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models , 2006, Bioinform..

[34]  M Chévremont,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[35]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[36]  S. Piippo,et al.  Illuminating the evolutionary history of liverworts (Marchantiophyta)—towards a natural classification , 2006, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[37]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[38]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[39]  D. Maddison,et al.  Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6 , 2009 .

[40]  A. M. Lucas,et al.  Avian anatomy : integument , 1974 .

[41]  D. Hasselquist,et al.  Carotenoid and protein supplementation have differential effects on pheasant ornamentation and immunity , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[42]  T. Hedderson,et al.  Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data , 2006, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[43]  M. Zuk,et al.  Endocrine-immune interactions, ornaments and mate choice in red jungle fowl , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  R. Buchholz Male dominance and variation in fleshy head ornamentation in Wild Turkeys , 1997 .

[45]  Peter R. Stettenheim The Integumentary Morphology of Modern Birds—An Overview1 , 2000 .

[46]  J. Ahlquist Phylogeny and classification of birds , 1985 .

[47]  E. Braun,et al.  Resolution of the phylogenetic position of the Congo peafowl, Afropavo congensis: a biogeographic and evolutionary enigma. , 1997, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[48]  J. Delacour,et al.  Curassows and Related Birds , 1973 .

[49]  M. Minkenberg Context and Consequence: The Impact of the New Radical Right on the Political Process in France and Germany , 1998 .

[50]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  W. Palmer,et al.  Pheasants, Partridges, and Grouse: A Guide to the Pheasants, Partridges, Quails, Grouse, Guineafowl, Buttonquails, and Sandgrouse of the World. , 2003 .

[52]  E. Braun,et al.  S20-2 Using molecular phylogenetics to interpret evolutionary changes in morphology and behavior in the Phasianidae , 2006 .

[53]  E. Braun,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of the peacock-pheasants (Galliformes: Polyplectron spp.) indicates loss and reduction of ornamental traits and display behaviours , 2001 .

[54]  C. Roselaar,et al.  The Megapodes: MegaPodiidae , 1995 .

[55]  C. Mateos,et al.  Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review , 1998 .