Eliciting and modelling expertise for serious games in project management

Abstract Without achieving a clear understanding of the learning domain, it is difficult to develop a successful serious game that enables users to achieve the desired learning outcomes. Thus, the first step in serious game design is to establish an understanding of the particular learning domain, usually through consultation with domain experts. Whilst game design is inherently a creative process, we believe the capturing of the knowledge domain can be systematised and we present a structured approach to knowledge elicitation and representation as a basis for serious game design. We have adapted and extended the applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) method and have combined it with additional knowledge representation frameworks. We explain how the outputs of this approach can inform the game mechanic and the development of non-player characters, and apply it to the design of a serious game aimed at reducing time-to-competence in soft project management skills for professionals working in corporate environments. A total of 26 domain experts from five different countries were involved in a two-stage interview process. The interviews yielded more than 300 task elements, and information about the cognition underlying the more challenging tasks. This data was incorporated into several representation frameworks and used to indicate features to be implemented in the game and the game mechanics of the supported features.

[1]  Valerie L. Shalin,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  ConcurTaskTrees: A Diagrammatic Notation for Specifying Task Models , 1997, INTERACT.

[3]  R. Hutton,et al.  Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner's toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[4]  Fotis Liarokapis,et al.  2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, VS-GAMES 2009, Coventry, UK, March 23-24, 2009 , 2009, VS-GAMES.

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Richard N. Van Eck Digital Game-Based Learning: It's Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless. , 2006 .

[7]  J. Vaughan,et al.  An Architecture to Support Autonomous Command Agents for OneSAF Testbed Simulations , 2002 .

[8]  Gerrit C. van der Veer,et al.  CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2005, CHI 2005.

[9]  Emma Norling On Evaluating Agents for Serious Games , 2009, AGS.

[10]  Ea Sonenberg,et al.  Creating interactive characters with BDI agents , 2004 .

[11]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Using a Task Modeling Formalism in the Design of Serious Games for Emergency Medical Procedures , 2009, 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications.

[12]  Clark Aldrich,et al.  The Complete Guide to Simulations and Serious Games: How the Most Valuable Content Will be Created in the Age Beyond Gutenberg to Google , 2009 .

[13]  Wayne Zachary,et al.  Cognitive task analysis and modeling of decision making in complex environments. , 1998 .

[14]  S. Chipman,et al.  Introduction to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2000 .

[15]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Cognitive Task Analysis: Current use and practice in the UK Armed Forces and elsewhere , 2005 .