Toward reflexive climate adaptation research

Climate adaptation research is expanding rapidly within an increasingly reflexive society where the relationship between academia and other social institutions is in a state of flux. Tensions exist between the two dominant research orientations of research about and research for adaptation. In particular, the research community is challenged to develop processes for successfully executing transdisciplinary research for adaptation when academic institutions and researchers are largely structured around traditional, disciplinary expertise and funding models. One tool for helping to manage this tension is a third, more reflexive, orientation toward adaptation research that is emerging in the literature. This new ‘research on adaptation research’ promises to help enhance understanding of the research enterprise itself and how it can become more adaptive.

[1]  C. Prescott,et al.  Crossing the Divide: Engaging scientists and policy-makers in adapting forest management to climate change in British Columbia , 2014 .

[2]  S. Howden,et al.  Informed adaptation: ethical considerations for adaptation researchers and decision-makers , 2015 .

[3]  K. Brown,et al.  Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion , 2007 .

[4]  T. Cannon,et al.  Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment , 2008 .

[5]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[6]  Mark Whitehead,et al.  Changing the intellectual climate , 2014 .

[7]  D. Freshwater,et al.  (Con) Fusing Commerce and Science , 2014 .

[8]  I. Otto,et al.  Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change , 2013 .

[9]  D. Guston Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[10]  Liz Sharp,et al.  Developing adaptive capacity through reflexivity: lessons from collaborative research with a UK water utility , 2014 .

[11]  Johanna Nalau,et al.  Is adaptation a local responsibility , 2015 .

[12]  Ruth Nettle,et al.  Doing integration in catchment management research: Insights into a dynamic learning process , 2015 .

[13]  Alexander Bisaro,et al.  A review and classification of analytical methods for climate change adaptation , 2015 .

[14]  Ann L. Cunliffe,et al.  On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner , 2004 .

[15]  Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al.  Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .

[16]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  A method to evaluate the usability of interactive climate change impact decision aids , 2014, Climatic Change.

[17]  Sirkku Juhola,et al.  The ability of Nordic countries to adapt to climate change: assessing adaptive capacity at the regional level , 2012 .

[18]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management , 2010 .

[19]  R. Pielke,et al.  Future economic damage from tropical cyclones: sensitivities to societal and climate changes , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Finding the findings in qualitative studies. , 2002, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[21]  R. Westaway,et al.  Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks , 2011 .

[22]  Malin Mobjörk Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[23]  Y. Kashima,et al.  Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers , 2014 .

[24]  Ryan Meyer,et al.  The Public Values Failures of Climate Science in the US , 2011 .

[25]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks , 2011 .

[26]  A. Giddens,et al.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , 1994 .

[27]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  Usable climate knowledge for adaptive and co-managed water governance , 2015 .

[28]  Timothy F. Smith,et al.  Adaptation or Manipulation? Unpacking Climate Change Response Strategies , 2012 .

[29]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[30]  A. Black,et al.  Extension theory and practice: a review , 2000 .

[31]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[32]  Wendy Proctor,et al.  Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand's water resource governance , 2011 .

[33]  J. Besley,et al.  What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate , 2011 .

[34]  Christopher A. Pohl,et al.  Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[35]  Emily Boyd,et al.  Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society , 2010 .

[36]  J. Pielke The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[37]  J. Mcevoy Multi- and interdisciplinary research—Problems of initiation, control, integration and reward , 1972 .

[38]  S. Jasanoff Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science , 1996 .

[39]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise , 2014 .

[40]  Pita Spruijt,et al.  Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review , 2014 .

[41]  Janine Rüegg,et al.  Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success , 2014 .

[42]  Paul Burton Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation , 2009 .

[43]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Economics of Adaptation , 2014 .

[44]  Rosalind J. Cornforth,et al.  Building climate resilience: Lessons of early warning in Africa , 2013 .

[45]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in Global Change Research , 2013 .

[46]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[47]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships , 2007 .

[48]  Benjamin L. Preston,et al.  Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations , 2011 .

[49]  H. Bulkeley Governing climate change: the politics of risk society? , 2001 .

[50]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Post-Normal Science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability , 2006 .

[51]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[52]  Laura R. Meagher,et al.  A rose by any other name? Transdisciplinarity in the context of UK research policy , 2015 .

[53]  D. McEvoy,et al.  Frame Divergence in Climate Change Adaptation Policy: Insights from Australian Local Government Planning , 2014 .

[54]  D. Green,et al.  Bridging the gap between theory and practice in climate change vulnerability assessments for remote Indigenous communities in northern Australia , 2012 .

[55]  M. Warner,et al.  Climate Change and the Co-Production of Knowledge and Policy in Rural US Communities , 2013 .

[56]  A. Patt,et al.  Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? , 2011 .

[57]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Adaptation Opportunities, Constraints, and Limits , 2014 .

[58]  M. Hajer Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[59]  Debra Javeline,et al.  The Most Important Topic Political Scientists Are Not Studying: Adapting to Climate Change , 2014, Perspectives on Politics.

[60]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[61]  C. Weible,et al.  Understanding and influencing the policy process , 2012 .

[62]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Limits to adaptation , 2013 .

[63]  Paul Burton,et al.  Planning for Climate Change: Is Greater Public Participation the Key to Success? , 2013 .

[64]  Anna Wesselink,et al.  If Post-Normal Science is the Solution, What is the Problem?: The Politics of Activist Environmental Science , 2011 .

[65]  Megan C. Maloney,et al.  Climate adaptation heuristics and the science/policy divide , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[66]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[67]  M. Gibbons Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science , 2000 .

[68]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Richard J.T. Klein,et al.  A Framework for Nordic Actor-Oriented Climate Adaptation Research , 2014 .

[70]  J. Hinkel “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface , 2011 .

[71]  A. Spence,et al.  The Psychological Distance of Climate Change , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[72]  F. Chapin,et al.  A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[73]  W. Adger,et al.  Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? , 2009 .

[74]  U. Beck,et al.  The Theory of Reflexive Modernization , 2003 .

[75]  Alexander Bisaro,et al.  Frontiers of solution-oriented adaptation research , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[76]  Rose Cairns,et al.  Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change , 2013 .

[77]  Janet Lewis Funding Social Science Research in Academia , 2000 .

[78]  Chris Foulds,et al.  Credibility in climate change research: a reflexive view. Tyndall Centre working paper 152. , 2012 .

[79]  Hartmut Fünfgeld,et al.  The Significance of Adaptation Framing in Local and Regional Climate Change Adaptation Initiatives in Australia , 2012 .

[80]  R. Swart,et al.  Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation , 2014, Front. Environ. Sci..

[81]  Manuel Gottschick Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective Transition Framework , 2013 .

[82]  Wim Wiewel,et al.  Collaborative research: Harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner , 1992 .

[83]  F. Wickson,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality , 2006 .

[84]  Rupert Seidl,et al.  Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[85]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Anti-reflexivity , 2010 .

[86]  Karin Bäckstrand,et al.  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2003 .

[87]  The corporatization of research in Australian higher education , 2002 .

[88]  David Simon,et al.  Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas , 2015 .

[89]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning , 2009 .

[90]  J. Hinkel,et al.  Methodological choices in solution-oriented adaptation research: a diagnostic framework , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[91]  D. Rose,et al.  Five ways to enhance the impact of climate science , 2014 .

[92]  A. Kumar,et al.  Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science , 2013, Science.