The Effects of Information Disaggregation and Financial Statement Interactivity on Judgments and Decisions of Nonprofessional Investors

ABSTRACT: Despite recent advances in Internet reporting technologies and calls for the increased reporting of disaggregated financial information, extant accounting research has not examined the potential positive and negative effects of providing disaggregated information using interactive web-based financial statements. In an experiment with nonprofessional investors, we investigate whether an Internet technology that provides investors control over the viewing of disaggregated financial information improves investment-related judgments and decisions and whether such effects depend on the utility of the disaggregation. In support of the notion that interactivity mitigates information overload, we find some evidence that the use of the drilldown capability is associated with a decrease in investors' perceived cognitive load. Results also show that investors using a drilldown capability are less susceptible to earnings fixation compared to investors viewing the disaggregation without the drilldown feature...

[1]  James R. Frederickson,et al.  The Effects of Pro Forma Earnings Disclosures on Analysts' and Nonprofessional Investors' Equity Valuation Judgments , 2004 .

[2]  Kevin E. Jackson,et al.  Disaggregating Management Forecasts to Reduce Investors’ Susceptibility to Earnings Fixation , 2011 .

[3]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Michael L. Ettredge,et al.  The Impact of SFAS No. 131 Business Segment Data on the Market's Ability to Anticipate Future Earnings , 2005 .

[5]  Brad M. Tuttle,et al.  The effects of a modest incentive on information overload in an investment analysis task , 1999 .

[6]  C. J. Wolfe,et al.  The effects of system design alternatives on the acquisition of tax knowledge from a computerized tax decision aid , 2000 .

[7]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modification , 2006, MIS Q..

[8]  W. B. Elliott Are Investors Influenced by Pro Forma Emphasis and Reconciliations in Earnings Announcements , 2006 .

[9]  Yeng Wai Lau Aggregated or disaggregated information first , 2014 .

[10]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  S. Varughese,et al.  PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS , 2014, WILEY 2020 Interpretation and Application of IFRS® Standards.

[12]  Kevin E. Jackson,et al.  The Association between Nonprofessional Investors' Information Choices and Their Portfolio Returns: The Importance of Investing Experience* , 2006 .

[13]  T. Wilks,et al.  Accounting for Lease Renewal Options: The Informational Effects of Unit of Account Choices , 2012 .

[14]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[15]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Experimental Research in Financial Accounting , 2001 .

[16]  Andrea Seaton Kelton,et al.  Internet financial reporting: The effects of information presentation format and content differences on investor decision making , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  T. Yohn,et al.  Disaggregating operating and financial activities: implications for forecasts of profitability , 2014 .

[18]  Ya‐wen Yang,et al.  The impact of corporate governance on Internet financial reporting , 2008 .

[19]  Ralph E. Viator,et al.  An Experimental Study of Multidimensional Hierarchical Accounting Data: Drill-Down Paths Can Influence Economic Decisions , 2007, J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  R. Bloomfield,et al.  Does Coordinated Presentation Help Credit Analysts Identify Firm Characteristics? , 2010 .

[21]  Lisa Koonce,et al.  How Disaggregation Enhances the Credibility of Management Earnings Forecasts , 2007 .

[22]  Kristina Rennekamp,et al.  Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability , 2012 .

[23]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  XBRL-Enabled, Spreadsheet, or PDF? Factors Influencing Exclusive User Choice of Reporting Technology , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  A. M. Harrell,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INFORMATION LOAD ON DECISION MAKERS' CUE UTILIZATION LEVELS AND DECISION QUALITY IN... , 1990 .

[25]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Kristina Rennekamp Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability: disclosure readability and investors’ reactions , 2012 .

[27]  Gerald L. Salamon,et al.  An Information Economic Perspective on Experimental Research in Accounting , 2006 .

[28]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  Corporate Reporting on the Internet , 1999 .

[29]  D. Hirshleifer,et al.  Limited Attention, Information Disclosure, and Financial Reporting , 2003 .

[30]  William N. Dilla,et al.  Interactive Data Visualization: New Directions for Accounting Information Systems Research , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Andrea Seaton Kelton,et al.  The Effects of Information Presentation Format on Judgment and Decision Making: A Review of the Information Systems Research , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Rebecca N. Hann,et al.  The Impact of SFAS No. 131 on Information and Monitoring , 2003 .

[33]  Laureen A. Maines,et al.  Does Search-facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting? , 2004 .

[34]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The effect of information presentation on decision making: A cost-benefit analysis , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[35]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[36]  David Y. Chan,et al.  Consequences of XBRL Standardization on Financial Statement Data , 2012, J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[38]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  The effects of decision aid structural restrictiveness on cognitive load, perceived usefulness, and reuse intentions , 2015, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Scott A. Emett,et al.  Earnings presentation effects on manager reporting choices and investor decisions , 2014 .

[40]  Linda S. McDaniel,et al.  Effects of Comprehensive‐Income Characteristics on Nonprofessional Investors' Judgments: The Role of Financial‐Statement Presentation Format , 2000 .

[41]  Nicholas Epley,et al.  The Unpacking Effect in Evaluative Judgments: When the Whole is Less than the Sum of its Parts , 2003 .

[42]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.