The perspectives of patients and their caregivers on self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a protocol for a mixed-methods overview
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Alonso-Coello | L. Martínez García | K. Salas-Gama | M. Heijmans | A. Viteri-García | K. Immonen | L. Ninov | E. Niño de Guzmán | A. Gonzalez | Jorge Huaringa | Carola Orrego-Villagrán | J. Pérez-Bracchiglione | Karla Salas-Gama | Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione
[1] P. Alonso-Coello,et al. The perspectives of patients and their caregivers on self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a protocol for a mixed-methods overview , 2021, F1000Research.
[2] H. Schünemann,et al. Colorectal cancer guidelines seldom include the patient perspective. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[3] J. McKenzie,et al. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence , 2018, Systematic Reviews.
[4] R. Visvanathan,et al. Effectiveness of exercise interventions on physical function in community-dwelling frail older people: an umbrella review of systematic reviews , 2018, JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports.
[5] A. Pollock,et al. An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview , 2018, Systematic Reviews.
[6] Benjamin Matthew Craig,et al. Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D , 2018, Quality of Life Research.
[7] Gordon H. Guyatt,et al. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[8] Kate Flemming,et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[9] A. Booth,et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] J. McKenzie,et al. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[11] Victoria Wade,et al. Mixed methods for telehealth research , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.
[12] P. Alonso-Coello,et al. Marcos GRADE de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD): un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 2: Guías de práctica clínica , 2017 .
[13] Anna Selva,et al. Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences , 2017, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
[14] K. Seers,et al. A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[15] H. Schünemann,et al. Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[16] E. Akl,et al. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach , 2017, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
[17] P. Pluye,et al. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[18] Stephanie J. C. Taylor,et al. Clinical-effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An overview of reviews , 2017, Chronic respiratory disease.
[19] C. Pope,et al. Experiences of long-term life-limiting conditions among patients and carers: what can we learn from a meta-review of systematic reviews of qualitative studies of chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease? , 2016, BMJ Open.
[20] Anindita Saha,et al. A Framework for Incorporating Patient Preferences Regarding Benefits and Risks into Regulatory Assessment of Medical Technologies. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[21] H. Boeije,et al. Self‐management support from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[22] J. McKenzie,et al. Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design , 2016, Systematic Reviews.
[23] Stephanie J. C. Taylor,et al. Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews , 2015, PloS one.
[24] Hanan Khalil,et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.
[25] P. Shekelle,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.
[26] Stephanie Taylor,et al. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions (PRISMS Practical systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions) , 2014 .
[27] Dawid Pieper,et al. Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[28] D. Pieper,et al. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[29] Pierre Pluye,et al. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. , 2014, Annual review of public health.
[30] Romina Brignardello-Petersen,et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[31] Elie A Akl,et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[32] Harris Cooper,et al. The overview of reviews: unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. , 2012, The American psychologist.
[33] Angela Harden,et al. Synthesis: combining results systematically and appropriately , 2012 .
[34] C. Pope,et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. , 2011, Health technology assessment.
[35] N. Mutrie,et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2011, Health technology assessment.
[36] Michele Tarsilla. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.
[37] James Thomas,et al. Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .
[38] Jennie Popay,et al. Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews , 2009 .
[39] M. Petticrew,et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[40] A. Oxman,et al. Overviews of Reviews , 2008 .
[41] Barbara A. Given,et al. Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care , 2008 .
[42] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[43] Chris Hyde,et al. Decision Making in Health and Medicine. Integrating Evidence and Values , 2005, ACP Journal Club.
[44] E H Wagner,et al. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.
[45] T. Bodenheimer,et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. , 2002, JAMA.
[46] C. Wright,et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.
[47] R. Tattersall. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. , 2002, Clinical medicine.
[48] M. Weinstein,et al. Decision Making in Health and Medicine , 2001 .
[49] P J Neumann,et al. Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[50] Patricia Flatley Brennan,et al. Review: Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[51] G. Guyatt,et al. [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines]. , 2018, Gaceta sanitaria.
[52] M. Tirani,et al. [Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise]. , 2015, Recenti progressi in medicina.
[53] Patricia A Grady,et al. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. , 2014, American journal of public health.
[54] G W Torrance,et al. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.