Seismic performance of an existing bridge with scoured caisson foundation

This paper presents in-situ seismic performance tests of a bridge before its demolition due to accumulated scouring problem. The tests were conducted on three single columns and one caisson-type foundation. The three single columns were 1.8 m in diameter, reinforced by 30-D32 longitudinal reinforcements and laterally hooped by D16 reinforcements with spacing of 20 cm. The column height is 9.54 m, 10.59 m and 10.37 m for Column P2, P3, and P4, respectively. Column P2 had no exposed foundation and was subjected to pseudo-dynamic tests with peak ground acceleration of 0.32 g first, followed by one cyclic loading test. Column P3 was the benchmark specimen with exposed length of 1.2 m on its foundation. The exposed length for Column P4 was excavated to 4 m, approximately 1/3 of the foundation length, to study the effect of the scouring problem to the column performance. Both Column P3 and Column P4 were subjected to cyclic loading tests. Based on the test results, due to the large dimension of the caisson foundation and the well graded gravel soil type that provided large lateral resistance, the seismic performance among the three columns had only minor differences. Lateral push tests were also conducted on the caisson foundation at Column P5. The caisson was 12 m long and had circular cross-sections whose diameters were 5 m in the upper portion and 4 m in the lower portion. An analytical model to simulate the test results was developed in the OpenSees platform. The analytical model comprised nonlinear flexural elements as well as nonlinear soil springs. The analytical results closely followed the experimental test results. A parametric study to predict the behavior of the bridge column with different ground motions and different levels of scouring on the foundation are also discussed.

[1]  Chris P. Pantelides,et al.  Case Study of Strategies for Seismic Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Multicolumn Bridge Bents , 2012 .

[2]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay , 2006 .

[3]  António Arêde,et al.  In situ cyclic tests on existing stone masonry walls and strengthening solutions , 2011 .

[4]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Lateral Performance of Full-Scale Bridge Abutment Wall with Granular Backfill , 2009 .

[5]  Yung-Yen Ko,et al.  Testing and analysis of a laterally loaded bridge caisson foundation in gravel , 2012 .

[6]  J Biarez,et al.  BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT OF PILE FOUNDATIONS , 1977 .

[7]  Cheng-Hsing Chen,et al.  Soil–structure interaction effects observed in the in situ forced vibration and pushover tests of school buildings in Taiwan and their modeling considering the foundation flexibility , 2010 .

[8]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Full Scale Cyclic Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges: Part II: Abutment Backwalls , 2007 .

[9]  Kenji Kosa,et al.  Seismic Performance of a Full-Size Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composite Bridge Column Based on E-Defense Shake Table Experiments , 2012 .

[10]  E. Faccioli,et al.  LARGE SCALE SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION EXPERIMENTS ON SAND UNDER CYCLIC LOADING , 1999 .

[11]  M. Eberhard,et al.  Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2009 .

[12]  G G Mayerhof,et al.  Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations , 1976 .

[13]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations , 2005 .

[14]  Chris P. Pantelides,et al.  IN-SITU TESTS OF THREE BENTS AT SOUTH TEMPLE BRIDGE ON INTERSTATE 15 , 2003 .

[15]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY OF EXTENDED PILE-SHAFTS. II: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 2002 .

[16]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[17]  Kenji Kosa,et al.  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF A FLEXURAL FAILURE TYPE REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE COLUMN BASED ON E-DEFENSE EXCITATION , 2009 .

[18]  Marc O. Eberhard,et al.  Practical performance model for bar buckling , 2005 .

[19]  Lawrence D. Reaveley,et al.  In-Situ Verification of Rehabilitation and Repair of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Bents under Simulated Seismic Loads , 2001 .

[20]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.