CABS-dock web server for the flexible docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site

Protein–peptide interactions play a key role in cell functions. Their structural characterization, though challenging, is important for the discovery of new drugs. The CABS-dock web server provides an interface for modeling protein–peptide interactions using a highly efficient protocol for the flexible docking of peptides to proteins. While other docking algorithms require pre-defined localization of the binding site, CABS-dock does not require such knowledge. Given a protein receptor structure and a peptide sequence (and starting from random conformations and positions of the peptide), CABS-dock performs simulation search for the binding site allowing for full flexibility of the peptide and small fluctuations of the receptor backbone. This protocol was extensively tested over the largest dataset of non-redundant protein–peptide interactions available to date (including bound and unbound docking cases). For over 80% of bound and unbound dataset cases, we obtained models with high or medium accuracy (sufficient for practical applications). Additionally, as optional features, CABS-dock can exclude user-selected binding modes from docking search or to increase the level of flexibility for chosen receptor fragments. CABS-dock is freely available as a web server at http://biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl/CABSdock.

[1]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  Mateusz Kurcinski,et al.  Steps towards flexible docking: Modeling of three-dimensional structures of the nuclear receptors bound with peptide ligands mimicking co-activators’ sequences , 2007, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[3]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Information-driven modeling of protein-peptide complexes. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[4]  Sebastian Kmiecik,et al.  Structure Prediction of the Second Extracellular Loop in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[5]  A. Sali,et al.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  A. Kolinski,et al.  Characterization of protein-folding pathways by reduced-space modeling , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Nicholas B Rego,et al.  3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL , 2014, Bioinform..

[8]  A Kolinski,et al.  Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Masha Y Niv,et al.  Peptidic modulators of protein‐protein interactions: Progress and challenges in computational design , 2009, Biopolymers.

[10]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2014, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[11]  A. Kolinski.  Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation. , 2004, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[12]  Nir London,et al.  Sub‐angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins , 2010, Proteins.

[13]  Dominik Czaplicki,et al.  Analysis and optimization of interactions between peptides mimicking the GD2 ganglioside and the monoclonal antibody 14G2a. , 2011, International journal of molecular medicine.

[14]  J. Sussman,et al.  JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia , 2013 .

[15]  Ora Schueler-Furman,et al.  Rosetta FlexPepDock web server—high resolution modeling of peptide–protein interactions , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Janusz M Bujnicki,et al.  Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold‐recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models , 2005, Proteins.

[17]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  Simulation of Chaperonin Effect on Protein Folding: A Shift from Nucleation–Condensation to Framework Mechanism , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Mateusz Kurcinski,et al.  Theoretical study of molecular mechanism of binding TRAP220 coactivator to Retinoid X Receptor alpha, activated by 9-cis retinoic acid , 2010, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[19]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  CABS-flex: server for fast simulation of protein structure fluctuations , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2016, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[21]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  A Unified Conformational Selection and Induced Fit Approach to Protein-Peptide Docking , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  John E. Coligan,et al.  Current Protocols in Protein Science , 1996 .

[23]  Mateusz Kurcinski,et al.  Mechanism of Folding and Binding of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein As Revealed by ab Initio Simulations. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  CABS-fold: server for the de novo and consensus-based prediction of protein structure , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  CABS-flex predictions of protein flexibility compared with NMR ensembles , 2014, Bioinform..