Productivity Growth, Bounded Marginal Utility, and Patterns of Trade

The workhorse model of the New Trade Theory fails to explain four strong and central patterns of postwar trade data. These patterns are, first, the massive increase in trade volumes, second, the small fraction of traded varieties the average country imports, third the correlation between per capita income growth and trade growth, and fourth, the correlation between trade growth and growth in the number of source countries per imported good. The present paper shows that a small and reasonable change in the demand structure can reconcile the model with the data. It departs from standard theory by assuming that consumers derive bounded marginal utility from varieties. This implies that consumers purchase only the cheaper share of varieties and that expensive foreign varieties bearing high transport costs are not imported. Technological progress which increases per capita consumption of the varieties in the consumption basket decreases marginal utility derived from each of them and induces consumers to extend their consumption to more expensive varieties produced at more distant locations. This additional margin along which trade can expand induces a substantial increase in the trade share as productivity grows. Productivity change is thus identified as a joint determinant of trade shares, the number of source countries per good, and per capita income, explaining the trends and correlations in the data.

[1]  Nancy L. Stokey Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  James E. Anderson A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .

[3]  J. Harrigan,et al.  SCALE ECONOMIES AND THE VOLUME OF TRADE , 1994 .

[4]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Trade Costs , 2004 .

[5]  David Hummels,et al.  Alternative Hypotheses and the Volume of Trade: Evidence on the Extent of Specialization , 1999 .

[6]  Kim J. Ruhl Solving the Elasticity Puzzle in International Economics , 2003 .

[7]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  U.S. Imports, Exports, and Tariff Data, 1989-2001 , 2002 .

[8]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and Exchange Risk , 1987 .

[9]  Finn E. Kydland,et al.  Dynamics of the Trade Balance and the Terms of Trade: the S-Curve , 1992 .

[10]  T. Kehoe,et al.  Why is Manufacturing Trade Rising Even as Manufacturing Output is Falling , 2004 .

[11]  A. Venables,et al.  Export Growth in Developing Countries: Market Entry and Bilateral Trade Flows , 2002 .

[12]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  David Hummels Have International Transportation Costs Declined , 2003 .

[14]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Income inequality in the United States , 2003 .

[15]  J. Markusen,et al.  Per-Capita Income as a Determinant of Trade , 1986 .

[16]  Alwyn Young,et al.  Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade , 1991 .

[17]  A. Cuñat,et al.  Can Comparative Advantage Explain the Growth of US Trade? , 2003 .

[18]  Nicolas Schmitt,et al.  Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade and the Growth of International Trade , 2002 .

[19]  J. Bergstrand The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade , 1990 .

[20]  Christian M. Broda,et al.  Variety Growth and World Welfare , 2004 .

[21]  Timothy J. Kehoe,et al.  Trade theory and trade facts , 2001 .

[22]  Thomas Chaney Distorted gravity: Heterogeneous Firms, Market Structure and the Geography of International Trade ∗ , 2004 .

[23]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Exports , 2005 .

[24]  P. Samuelson,et al.  Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory with a Continuum of Goods , 1980 .

[25]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Productivity Spillovers, Terms of Trade, and the 'Home Market Effect' , 2005 .

[26]  R. Feenstra,et al.  World Trade Flows: 1962-2000 , 2005 .

[27]  P. Aghion,et al.  Handbook of Economic Growth , 2005 .

[28]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences , 1995 .

[29]  W. Baumol Income and Substitution Effects in the Linder Theorem , 1973 .

[30]  P. Krugman Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade , 1980 .

[31]  Scott L. Baier,et al.  The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity , 2001 .

[32]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  Market Size, Trade, and Productivity , 2005, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[33]  David E. Weinstein,et al.  Globalization and the Gains from Variety , 2004 .

[34]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[35]  P. Samuelson,et al.  Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods - , 1976 .

[36]  J. Ventura A Global View of Economic Growth , 2005 .

[37]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Technology, Geography, and Trade , 2002 .