Capitalization on chance in variable-length classification tests employing the Sequential Probability Ratio Test

The sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) is a popular termination criterion for variable-length classification tests. The SPRT is often paired with cut-based item selection in which item information is maximized at the cut point. However, items are chosen on the basis of their parameter estimates, and capitalization on chance may occur. We investigated the effects of capitalization on chance on test length and classification accuracy in several variable-length test simulations. In addition to capitalizing on large discrimination estimates, the item selection criterion chose items with difficulty estimates systematically higher or lower than their true difficulty values. This capitalization on chance had non-negligible effects on both test length and classification accuracy and induced an inverse relationship between them, though the particular effects were highly sensitive to the cut location. The results also indicate that implementing item exposure control effectively reduced the effects of capitalization on chance on testing outcomes.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Nathan A. Thompson Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing , 2009 .

[3]  Matthew Finkelman,et al.  On Using Stochastic Curtailment to Shorten the SPRT in Sequential Mastery Testing , 2008 .

[4]  Nathan A. Thompson A Practitioner's Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing , 2007 .

[5]  Chuan-Ju Lin,et al.  Effects of Item-Selection Criteria on Classification Testing with the Sequential Probability Ratio Test. ACT Research Report Series. , 2000 .

[6]  Theodorus Johannes Hendrikus Maria Eggen,et al.  Item Selection in Adaptive Testing with the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1999 .

[7]  Judith A. Spray,et al.  The Effect of Model Misspecification on Classification Decisions Made Using a Computerized Test , 1999 .

[8]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  Capitalization on Item Calibration Error in Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[9]  Identifiers California,et al.  Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education , 1998 .

[10]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  Comparison of SPRT and Sequential Bayes Procedures for Classifying Examinees Into Two Categories Using a Computerized Test , 1996 .

[11]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Item Parameter Estimation Errors and Their Influence on Test Information Functions , 1994 .

[12]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Influence of Item Parameter Estimation Errors in Test Development. , 1993 .

[13]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  The Effect of Item Parameter Estimation Error on Decisions Made Using the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1987 .

[14]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  A Procedure for Decision Making Using Tailored Testing , 1983 .

[15]  H. Wainer,et al.  Some standard errors in item response theory , 1982 .

[16]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.