Using robot pets instead of companion animals for older people: a case of 'reinventing the wheel'?

Robot pets are being developed and deployed to provide companionship for older adults. While robot pets offer some therapeutic benefits, their intended use for 'companionship' often provokes ethical debate, including concern that interactions with robot pets are demeaning or lack value compared to other social interactions. Another concern is that robot pets provide no real advantages over companion animals. This conceptual paper draws on philosophy, human-animal bond research, and technology development in robotics, to consider whether robot pets provide new opportunities for companionship as opposed to just 'reinventing the wheel'. We argue that robot pets may sometimes be as beneficial as companion animals or offer something different and distinctive. The paper provides a foundation for further multidisciplinary research to advance understanding of the ethical issues and the opportunities and challenges that arise in our ongoing and changing relationships with new technologies such as robot pets.

[1]  S E Crow,et al.  Human/animal bond. , 1983, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[2]  Lynette A. Hart,et al.  Companion Animals and Us – Exploring the Relationships between People and Pets , 2001 .

[3]  Peter H. Kahn,et al.  Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Rachel L. Franz,et al.  Adoption and feasibility of a communication app to enhance social connectedness amongst frail institutionalized oldest old: an embedded case study , 2017 .

[5]  W. Moyle,et al.  Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[6]  L. Andersson,et al.  Moral Stress: synthesis of a concept , 2003, Nursing ethics.

[7]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Older people and robotic technologies in the home: perspectives from recent research literature , 2017, PETRA.

[8]  Takefumi Kikusui,et al.  Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[9]  I. Robertson,et al.  The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses. , 2000, International journal for parasitology.

[10]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Dispelling ageing myths in technology design , 2013, OZCHI.

[11]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Captioned photographs in psychosocial aged care: relationship building and boundary work , 2014, CHI.

[12]  Raymond Coppinger,et al.  Evolution of working dogs , 2016 .

[13]  C. Allen,et al.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2008 .

[14]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention , 2016, CHI.

[15]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[16]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Our Year With the Glass: Expectations, Letdowns and Ethical Dilemmas of Technology Trials With Vulnerable People , 2017, Interact. Comput..

[17]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Machines as a source of consolation: Robot responsiveness increases human approach behavior and desire for companionship , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  M. O’Haire,et al.  Animal-Assisted Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review , 2012, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[19]  M. Midgley Animals and Why They Matter , 1984, Mary Midgley.

[20]  M. Halm,et al.  The healing power of the human-animal connection. , 2008, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[21]  Bree J. Westphal,et al.  Experience of designing and deploying a tablet game for people with dementia , 2017, OZCHI.

[22]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership , 2006 .

[23]  Luc Steels,et al.  When are robots intelligent autonomous agents? , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human–poultry interaction through the internet , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Are Emotional Robots Deceptive? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[26]  Don G. Bouwhuis Current use and possibilities of robots in care , 2016 .

[27]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Rethinking the Design of Robotic Pets for Older Adults , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  EunJeong Cheon,et al.  Configuring the User: "Robots have Needs Too" , 2017, CSCW.

[29]  L. Kulik,et al.  Older adults as digital content producers , 2013, CHI.

[30]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Negotiating stereotypes of older adults through avatars , 2017, OZCHI.

[31]  Lisa Wood,et al.  More than a Furry Companion: The Ripple Effect of Companion Animals on Neighborhood Interactions and Sense of Community , 2007 .

[32]  L. Vygotsky Imagination and Creativity in Childhood , 2004 .

[33]  Vero Vanden Abeele,et al.  The domestication of digital games in the lives of older adults , 2015, New Media Soc..

[34]  K. Luijkx,et al.  Social needs of older people: a systematic literature review , 2017, Ageing and Society.

[35]  Markus M. Grabka,et al.  Pets and Human Health in Germany and Australia: National Longitudinal Results , 2007 .

[36]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members , 2001, CHI.

[37]  T. Shibata,et al.  Engaging with artificial pets , 2005 .

[38]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Group sessions with Paro in a nursing home: Structure, observations and interviews , 2016, Australasian journal on ageing.

[39]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Sensor-based observations of daily living for aging in place , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[40]  D. Haraway The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness , 2003 .

[41]  Russell Blackford Robots and reality: a reply to Robert Sparrow , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[42]  Amol Dattatraya Mali On the behavior-based architectures of autonomous agency , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[43]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Machine Ethics , 2011 .

[44]  R. Sparrow The March of the robot dogs , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[45]  Freya Mathews Without Animals Life Is Not Worth Living , 2016 .

[46]  A. Fine Handbook on animal-assisted therapy. Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice , 2010 .

[47]  Wendy Moyle,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies , 2018, The Gerontologist.

[48]  Dirk Preuß,et al.  Living with the animals: animal or robotic companions for the elderly in smart homes? , 2016, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[49]  H. C. Wilson Filling the Ark: Animal Welfare in Disasters , 2009 .

[50]  D. Boucher The Biology of mutualism :: ecology and evolution , 1985 .

[51]  A. Beck,et al.  Future Directions in Human-Animal Bond Research , 2003 .

[52]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[53]  Rachel L. Franz,et al.  "My Hand Doesn't Listen to Me!": Adoption and Evaluation of a Communication Technology for the 'Oldest Old' , 2015, CHI.

[54]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Robotic Pets in Human Lives: Implications for the Human–Animal Bond and for Human Relationships with Personified Technologies , 2009 .

[55]  T. Ziemke Are Robots Embodied ? , 2001 .

[56]  M. O’Haire,et al.  Companion animals and human health: Benefits, challenges, and the road ahead , 2010 .

[57]  雅夫 金森,et al.  ペット型ロボットによる高齢者の Quality of Life 維持・向上の試み , 2002 .

[58]  Raffaele Rodogno,et al.  Social robots, fiction, and sentimentality , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[59]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[60]  J. Serpell,et al.  The Human-Animal Bond , 2017 .

[61]  Edward Duca Will robots take over the world , 2013 .

[62]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality Dimensions in Nonhuman Animals , 1999 .

[63]  Anna Chur-Hansen,et al.  Reasons Given by Elderly Men and Women for Not Owning a Pet, and the Implications for Clinical Practice and Research , 2008, Journal of health psychology.

[64]  S. Barker,et al.  The benefits of human-companion animal interaction: a review. , 2008, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[65]  W. Banks,et al.  The effects of group and individual animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in residents of long-term care facilities , 2005 .

[66]  W. Moyle,et al.  Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike Plush Toy: a descriptive qualitative approach , 2018, Aging & mental health.

[67]  Suzanne Hetts,et al.  The Human-Animal Bond and Grief , 1994 .

[68]  Y. Barak,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy for elderly schizophrenic patients: a one-year controlled trial. , 2001, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[69]  Jacquie Rand,et al.  Dog‐assisted therapy for older people with dementia: A review , 2008, Australasian journal on ageing.

[70]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  Co-design and Robots: A Case Study of a Robot Dog for Aging People , 2016, ICSR.

[71]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[72]  T. Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly – A Mini-Review , 2010, Gerontology.

[73]  D. Degrazia,et al.  Taking Animals Seriously-Mental life and moral status , 1996 .

[74]  C. Gastmans,et al.  The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. , 2018, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[75]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[76]  Josep Blat,et al.  When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a 'turn to community' in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[77]  Leo K. Bustad,et al.  Animals, Aging, and the Aged , 1981 .

[78]  Bernard E. Rollin,et al.  Euthanasia and Moral Stress , 2008 .

[79]  Lukman Thalib,et al.  Using a therapeutic companion robot for dementia symptoms in long-term care: reflections from a cluster-RCT , 2019, Aging & mental health.

[80]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children , 2001, 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556).

[81]  M. Kanamori,et al.  [Maintenance and improvement of quality of life among elderly patients using a pet-type robot]. , 2002, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[82]  C. Faver,et al.  Love, Safety, and Companionship: The Human-Animal Bond and Latino Families , 2008 .