Influence of Combined Afferent Stimulation and Task-Specific Training Following Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background. Reorganization of the human motor cortex can be induced by specific patterns of peripheral afferent stimulation. The potential for afferent stimulation to facilitate the functional recovery associated with conventional rehabilitative techniques has not previously been investigated. Objective. The authors sought to determine whether combining appropriate afferent stimulation with task-specific training resulted in greater improvements than training alone in patients with impaired upper limb function in the subacute phase following stroke. Method. Twenty patients with hemiparesis due to stroke were allocated randomly to either a stimulation or control group. All received 9 sessions of task-specific physiotherapy training over 3 weeks. Prior to each training session, associative electrical stimulation of the motor point of 2 hand muscles was given in the stimulation group, whereas the control group received sham stimulation. Changes in dexterity were assessed using a grip-lift task, and standard measures of upper-limb function were made before and following the intervention. Corticospinal excitability was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results. Both groups showed comparable improvements in functional measures of upper-limb function. Of the 20 patients, only 14 could perform the grip-lift task, which is an objective measure of dexterity. Patients in the stimulation group From the Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of exhibited significantly greater improvements in this task than the control group. There was no significant change in corticospinal excitability in either group. Conclusion. This pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting that targeted afferent stimulation may facilitate the response to conventional rehabilitation in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke, but these results need to be confirmed in a larger scale study.

[1]  C. Winstein,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  T. S. Miles,et al.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  C. Galloway Agonist and Antagonist Activity During Voluntary Upper-Limb Movement in Patients with Stroke , 1994 .

[7]  Gary Kamen,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Ridding,et al.  Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  P. Duncan,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control , 1987 .

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[12]  M. Ridding,et al.  Modification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients , 2003, Neuroreport.

[15]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  T. Olsen,et al.  Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  P. Pohl,et al.  Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. , 1999, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[18]  RaimondoTraversa,et al.  Mapping of Motor Cortical Reorganization After Stroke , 1997 .

[19]  Mary Elizabeth Parker,et al.  Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1995 .

[20]  Lumy Sawaki,et al.  Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  M. Ridding,et al.  Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D. Nowak,et al.  Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Enhancement of Recovery from Stroke: A Prospective, Multicenter Safety Study , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[25]  H. Vet,et al.  Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[26]  Julie Duque,et al.  Correlation between impaired dexterity and corticospinal tract dysgenesis in congenital hemiplegia. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[28]  R. Lemon,et al.  Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: Organizational differences for motor specialization? , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[32]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Michael C. Ridding,et al.  Impairments in precision grip correlate with functional measures in adult hemiplegia , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  C. Capaday,et al.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. Liepert,et al.  Training‐induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients , 2000, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[36]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  S. Page,et al.  Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  L. Cohen,et al.  Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  T. Miles,et al.  Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input–output characteristics , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Neurology.

[41]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[42]  T. Olsen,et al.  Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. , 1990, Stroke.

[43]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. , 1994, Science.

[44]  M. Ridding,et al.  Afferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  M. Hallett,et al.  Improving hand function in chronic stroke. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[46]  Stephen J Page,et al.  Intensity versus task-specificity after stroke: how important is intensity? , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[47]  M. Ridding,et al.  Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[48]  M. Hallett,et al.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Gary W. Thickbroom,et al.  Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[51]  M. Ridding,et al.  Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  Gary W Thickbroom,et al.  Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 1 December 2000. , 2001, Brain Research.

[53]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  M. Ridding,et al.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? , 2003, Neurology.