A Causal Power Semantics for Generic Sentences

Many generic sentences express stable inductive generalizations. Stable inductive generalizations are typically true for a causal reason. In this paper we investigate to what extent this is also the case for the generalizations expressed by generic sentences. More in particular, we discuss the possibility that many generic sentences of the form ‘ks have feature e’ are true because (members of) kind k have the causal power to ‘produce’ feature e. We will argue that such an analysis is quite close to a probabilistic based analysis of generic sentences according to which ‘relatively many’ ks have feature e, and that, in fact, this latter type of analysis can be ‘grounded’ in terms of causal powers. We will argue, moreover, that the causal power analysis is sometimes preferred to a correlation-based analysis, because it takes the causal structure that gives rise to the probabilistic data into account.

[1]  Christopher R. Hitchcock,et al.  Probabilistic Measures of Causal Strength , 2011 .

[2]  Alexander J Bird,et al.  Nature's metaphysics : laws and properties , 2007 .

[3]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Think Generic!: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences , 1999 .

[4]  David J. Schneider,et al.  The Psychology of Stereotyping , 2003 .

[5]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[6]  I. Good A CAUSAL CALCULUS (I)* , 1961, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[7]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[8]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support: Theoretical and Empirical Issues* , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Augmented Rescorla-Wagner and Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 2005, NIPS.

[10]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[11]  B. Rehder A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Generics: Cognition and Acquisition , 2008 .

[14]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[15]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  5. Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition 1 , 2013 .

[16]  N. Cartwright Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement , 1995 .

[17]  G. Strawson,et al.  The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume , 2014 .

[18]  P. Cheng,et al.  Assessing interactive causal influence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  S. Sloman Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives , 2005 .

[20]  C. Glymour The Mind's Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology , 2000 .

[21]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Theoretical concepts and hypothetico-inductive inference , 1973 .

[22]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Degree of Factual Support , 1952, Philosophy of Science.

[23]  J. Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[24]  N. Goodman Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[25]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[26]  B. Skyrms Causal necessity: A pragmatic investigation of the necessity of laws , 1980 .

[27]  C. K. Ogden,et al.  The Meaning of Meaning , 1923 .

[28]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Natural kinds and dispositions: a causal analysis , 2019, Synthese.

[29]  Y. Greenberg Manifestations of Genericity , 2003 .

[30]  D. Osherson,et al.  Comparison of confirmation measures , 2007, Cognition.

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[32]  R. Rooij,et al.  Generics and typicality , 2017 .

[33]  Regine Eckardt,et al.  Normal Objects, Normal Worlds and the Meaning of Generic Sentences , 1999, J. Semant..

[34]  E. Madden,et al.  Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity , 1975 .

[35]  M. C. Sheps,et al.  Shall we count the living of the dead. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .

[37]  Sally Haslanger,et al.  Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground , 2011 .

[38]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[39]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[40]  P. Cheng From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .

[41]  Alice ter Meulen,et al.  Genericity: An Introduction , 1995 .

[42]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[43]  Brian Ellis,et al.  Causal Powers and Laws of Nature , 1999 .

[44]  G. Chapman,et al.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[45]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[46]  S. Mumford,et al.  A powerful theory of causation , 2010 .

[47]  David Danks,et al.  Unifying the Mind: Cognitive Representations as Graphical Models , 2014 .

[48]  Sydney Shoemaker,et al.  Causality and Properties , 1980 .

[49]  J. Pearl Interpretation and Identification of Causal Mediation , 2013, Psychological methods.