Anatomic characteristics of culprit sites in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND A detailed analysis of the anatomic relationships of the site of culprit lesions that have resulted in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has not been reported. METHODS Coronary angiograms of consecutive patients who presented with ACS were analyzed according to multiple anatomic criteria. RESULTS In left anterior descending artery (LAD) (n = 85), 85% of culprit lesions were located in the first 40 mm from the ostium. The presence of angulation on the lesion increased the risk of an ACS 1.92 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.07), and the presence of bifurcation after the lesion increased the risk 1.65 times (95% CI 1.04-2.62). Angulated lesions located within the first 40 mm from the ostium and before a bifurcation presented an 11-fold increased risk for an ACS. In right coronary artery (RCA) (n = 58), the risk of plaque rupture was almost 2.5 times higher in lesions located between 10 and 50 mm from the ostium compared to those located in 90-130 mm (relative risk [RR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.25-4.56). In left circumflex (LCx) (n = 40), the risk of plaque rupture was almost 4.5 and 5 times higher in the first 20 mm, and between 20 and 40 mm from the ostium, respectively, compared to 60 and 80 mm (relative risk [RR] 4.58, 95% CI 1.01-20.68 for 0-20 mm, and RR 4.95, 95% CI 1.14-21.47 for 20-40 mm) after adjustment for the presence of curve on the lesion. The presence of lesion angulation increased the risk of plaque rupture almost three times (RR 3.22, 95% CI 1.49-6.93). CONCLUSION Specific anatomic features of the coronary arteries predispose to development and/or subsequent rupture of vulnerable plaques.

[1]  B. Meier Plaque sealing by coronary angioplasty , 2004, Heart.

[2]  M. Stadius,et al.  The angiographie definitions of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation , 1992 .

[3]  C. Zarins,et al.  Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis: Quantitative Correlation of Plaque Localization with Flow Velocity Profiles and Wall Shear Stress , 1983, Circulation research.

[4]  J D Thomas,et al.  Toward the quiescent coronary plaque. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  D. L. Fry Acute Vascular Endothelial Changes Associated with Increased Blood Velocity Gradients , 1968, Circulation research.

[6]  A. Clowes,et al.  Increased blood flow induces regression of intimal hyperplasia. , 1997, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[7]  V. Fuster,et al.  The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2). , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  T. Karino,et al.  Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. , 1990, Circulation research.

[9]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary plaque disruption. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  Lambros Kaiktsis,et al.  Wall shear stress: theoretical considerations and methods of measurement. , 2007, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[11]  J. Kaski,et al.  Rapid angiographic progression of coronary artery disease in patients with angina pectoris. The role of complex stenosis morphology. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  B. Meier,et al.  Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma of the mitral valve chordae , 2004, Heart.

[13]  R. Schroter,et al.  Atheroma and arterial wall shear - Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Plaque ruptures in stable angina pectoris compared with acute coronary syndrome. , 2007, International Journal of Cardiology.

[15]  W. Roberts,et al.  Hemodynamic shear force in rupture of coronary arterial atherosclerotic plaques. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  R. Nerem,et al.  Assessment of wall shear stress in arteries, applied to the coronary circulation. , 1980, Cardiovascular research.

[17]  C. Ross Ethier,et al.  Effects of Cardiac Motion on Right Coronary Artery Hemodynamics , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Demosthenes G. Katritsis,et al.  Hemodynamic factors and atheromatic plaque rupture in the coronary arteries: from vulnerable plaque to vulnerable coronary segment , 2007, Coronary artery disease.

[19]  Sharon-Lise T. Normand,et al.  Coronary Artery Spatial Distribution of Acute Myocardial Infarction Occlusions , 2004, Circulation.

[20]  M J Davies,et al.  Mechanisms of progression in native coronary artery disease: role of healed plaque disruption , 1999, Heart.

[21]  Gary S. Mintz,et al.  The site of plaque rupture in native coronary arteries: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound analysis. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  John D Carroll,et al.  Stress analysis using anatomically realistic coronary tree. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  L. Talbot,et al.  Flow in Curved Pipes , 1983 .

[24]  W. Nichols,et al.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles , 1998 .

[25]  M. S. Hamid,et al.  Effects of cyclic flexion of coronary arteries on progression of atherosclerosis. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  S. Alper,et al.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. , 1999, JAMA.

[27]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque , 2006 .

[28]  J S Alpert,et al.  Distribution and severity of coronary artery disease in 500 patients with angina pectoris. , 1979, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[29]  P. Serruys,et al.  Plaque composition in the left main stem mimics the distal but not the proximal tract of the left coronary artery: influence of clinical presentation, length of the left main trunk, lipid profile, and systemic levels of C-reactive protein. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  P. Serruys,et al.  Distance from the ostium as an independent determinant of coronary plaque composition in vivo: an intravascular ultrasound study based radiofrequency data analysis in humans. , 2006, European heart journal.

[31]  Ajay J. Kirtane,et al.  Distance from the Coronary Ostium to the Culprit Lesion in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and its Implications Regarding the Potential Prevention of Proximal Plaque Rupture , 2003, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[32]  A Benslimane,et al.  Stenting of bifurcation lesions: Classification, treatments, and results , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[33]  Nitzan Resnick,et al.  Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse. , 2003, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[34]  W. Harland,et al.  Sudden coronary death in Glasgow: nature and frequency of acute coronary lesions. , 1987, British heart journal.

[35]  J. Hochman,et al.  The distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in the coronary arterial tree: relation to cardiac risk factors. , 1988, American heart journal.

[36]  R. T. Eppink,et al.  Pressure-induced mechanical stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: a possible correlation to atherosclerosis. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[38]  B. Fox,et al.  Distribution of fatty and fibrous plaques in young human coronary arteries. , 1982, Atherosclerosis.

[39]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.