Treatment outcomes of mucosal melanoma of head and neck: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced disease

Background Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma. HNMM often develops as a recurrent or metastatic disease, and its prognosis is worse than that of cutaneous melanoma. Recent large-scale clinical studies have reported favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for melanoma. However, these clinical trials included only a small number of HNMM cases. This study aimed to estimate treatment outcomes and prognostic predictors of ICIs for advanced HNMM. Methods Cases of advanced HNMM, defined as unresectable or metastatic HNMM at the initial diagnosis (five patients) or development of recurrent/metastatic HNMM after initial treatment (27 patients), were included in this study. Survival analysis and a search for prognostic factors were performed for these 32 patients. Furthermore, the detailed clinical course of patients who received ICI treatment was investigated. Results The median overall survival (OS) of 32 patients with advanced HNMM was 25.3 months. The estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 68.4%, 42.8%, and 34.3%, respectively. Fourteen patients (43.7%) received ICIs, whereas 18 (56.3%) did not. Univariate analysis showed that ICI treatment was the only factor associated with a better 1-year OS. Patients who received ICI treatment had significantly longer OS (median OS: not reached, 1-year OS: 85.7%) than those who did not (median OS: 11.3 months, 1-year OS: 54.5%). The overall response and disease control rates of patients who received ICI treatment were 50% and 64.3%, respectively. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to ICI treatment survived significantly longer (1-year OS: 100%) than those who did not (1-year OS: 71.4%). Among the five patients who discontinued ICI treatment due to severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), four did not receive salvage treatments but showed durable treatment effects and survived for 9.8–54.2 months at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions ICI treatment achieved a favorable OS for advanced HNMM. CR/PR to ICI treatment and discontinuation owing to severe irAEs were favorable predictors of OS.

[1]  A. Walker,et al.  Immunotherapy as a treatment modality for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: A systematic review , 2022, Medicine.

[2]  S. Lourenço,et al.  The Role of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Evaluation of Pigmented Oral Lesions and Their Relationship With Histopathological Aspects , 2022, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[3]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Real-world efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody or combined anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, with or without radiotherapy, in advanced mucosal melanoma patients: A retrospective, multicenter study. , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[4]  J. McQuade,et al.  The efficacy of anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 therapy among patients with metastatic acral and metastatic mucosal melanoma , 2021, Cancer medicine.

[5]  P. Rubegni,et al.  Review of Dermoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Features of the Mucosal Melanoma , 2021, Diagnostics.

[6]  C. Bai,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma: a systematic review , 2020, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[7]  A. Tan,et al.  The Mutational Landscape of Mucosal Melanoma. , 2020, Seminars in cancer biology.

[8]  Y. Kiyohara,et al.  Immune‐related adverse events correlate with improved survival in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma treated with nivolumab: A single‐center retrospective study in Japan , 2020, The Journal of dermatology.

[9]  R. Uchi,et al.  Relationship between immune-related adverse events and the long-term outcomes in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. , 2019, Oral oncology.

[10]  G. Calais,et al.  Oncologic outcomes, prognostic factor analysis and therapeutic algorithm evaluation of head and neck mucosal melanomas in France. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[11]  M. M. Qureshi,et al.  Survival outcomes of mucosal melanoma in the USA. , 2019, Future oncology.

[12]  S. Kimura,et al.  Discontinuation due to immune‐related adverse events is a possible predictive factor for immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer , 2019, Thoracic cancer.

[13]  Kazuhiko Yoshida,et al.  Association between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. , 2019, Urologic oncology.

[14]  R. Chiari,et al.  Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: long-term outcomes from a multi-institutional analysis , 2018, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[15]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Durable Clinical Benefit in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Discontinue PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy for Immune-Related Adverse Events , 2018, Cancer Immunology Research.

[16]  A. Ho,et al.  Predictors of survival in head and neck mucosal melanoma. , 2017, Oral oncology.

[17]  T. Higashi,et al.  Characteristics of melanoma in Japan: a nationwide registry analysis 2011–2013 , 2017, Melanoma research.

[18]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Pérez-García,et al.  NRAS-mutant melanoma: current challenges and future prospect , 2017, OncoTargets and therapy.

[20]  Y. Shioyama,et al.  Multicenter Study of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: Subanalysis of the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS) Study (1402 HN). , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  K. Savage,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  E. Cinotti,et al.  Confocal Microscopy for Special Sites and Special Uses. , 2016, Dermatologic clinics.

[23]  Johan Hansson,et al.  Stage-specific survival and recurrence in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe – a systematic review of the literature , 2016, Clinical epidemiology.

[24]  R. de Bree,et al.  Update on primary head and neck mucosal melanoma , 2016, Head & neck.

[25]  J. Utikal,et al.  Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[26]  Dirk Schadendorf,et al.  Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Impact of NRAS Mutations for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Therapies , 2015, Cancer Immunology Research.

[29]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  C. Berking,et al.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  Y. Kanda,et al.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR' for medical statistics , 2012, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[32]  J. Verne,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of malignant mucosal and uveal melanomas and adnexal skin carcinomas in Europe. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[33]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[34]  A. Sikora,et al.  Predictors of Survival in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[35]  C. Cui,et al.  Clinical presentation, histology, and prognoses of malignant melanoma in ethnic Chinese: A study of 522 consecutive cases , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[36]  V. de Giorgi,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of solitary oral pigmented lesions: a prospective study , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[37]  L. Karnell,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma , 1998, Cancer.

[38]  Daan Brandenbarg The National. , 1892 .

[39]  Y. Shioyama,et al.  Multicenter Study of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Subanalysis of the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS) Study (1402 HN). , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[41]  J. Manson,et al.  Prospective Study of , 2007 .

[42]  J. Cooper Ajcc Cancer Staging Manual , 1997 .