Detection of intraneural needle-placement with multiple frequency bioimpedance monitoring: a novel method

Electrical impedance measurements have been used to detect intraneural needle placement, but there is still a lack of precision with this method. The purpose of the study was to develop a method for the discrimination of nerve tissue from other tissue types based on multiple frequency impedance measurements. Impedance measurements with 25 different frequencies between 1.26 and 398 kHz were obtained in eight pigs while placing the tip of a stimulation needle within the sciatic nerve and in other tissues. Various impedance variables and measurement frequencies were tested for tissue discrimination. Best tissue discrimination was obtained by using three different impedance parameters with optimal measurement frequencies: Modulus (126 kHz), Phase angle (40 kHz) and the Delta of the phase angle (between 126 and 158 kHz). These variables were combined in a Compound variable C. The area under the curve in a receiver operating characteristic was consecutively increased for the Modulus (78 %), Phase angle (86 %), Delta of the phase angle (94 %), and the Compound variable C (97 %), indicating highest specificity and sensitivity for C. An algorithm based on C was implemented in a real-time feasibility test and used in an additional test animal to demonstrate our new method. Discrimination between nerve tissue and other tissue types was improved by combining several impedance variables at multiple measurement frequencies.

[1]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Combination of intraneural injection and high injection pressure leads to fascicular injury and neurologic deficits in dogs , 2004, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[2]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[3]  B. Tsui,et al.  Electrical Impedance to Distinguish Intraneural from Extraneural Needle Placement in Porcine Nerves during Direct Exposure and Ultrasound Guidance , 2008, Anesthesiology.

[4]  H Kalvøy,et al.  A finite element model of needle electrode spatial sensitivity , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Brachial plexus block with or without ultrasound guidance , 2009, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[7]  Franklin Fa-Kun Kuo,et al.  Network analysis and synthesis , 1962 .

[8]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  X. Capdevila,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Evaluation of the Local Anesthetic Spread Parameters Required for a Rapid Surgical Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block , 2010, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[10]  Paul E Bigeleisen,et al.  Extraneural versus Intraneural Stimulation Thresholds during Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[11]  C. Franco Connective Tissues Associated With Peripheral Nerves , 2012, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[12]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Electrical Impedance of Stainless Steel Needle Electrodes , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  A. Borgeat,et al.  Acute and Nonacute Complications Associated with Interscalene Block and Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Study , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[14]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Monitoring during peripheral nerve blockade , 2010, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[15]  Q. Hogan Pathophysiology of Peripheral Nerve Injury During Regional Anesthesia , 2008, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[16]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Impedance-based tissue discrimination for needle guidance , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[17]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Minimal Current Intensity to Elicit an Evoked Motor Response Cannot Discern Between Needle-Nerve Contact and Intraneural Needle Insertion , 2014, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  L. A. Geddes,et al.  The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes , 1971, Medical and biological engineering.

[19]  A. Hadžić,et al.  Neurologic and histologic outcome after intraneural injections of lidocaine in canine sciatic nerves , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  S Sunderland,et al.  The connective tissues of peripheral nerves. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  S. Grimnes,et al.  Invasive Electrical Impedance Tomography for Blood Vessel Detection , 2010, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[22]  Hannes Gatterer,et al.  Bioimpedance Identifies Body Fluid Loss after Exercise in the Heat: A Pilot Study with Body Cooling , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  P. Shannon,et al.  An Ultrasonographic and Histological Study of Intraneural Injection and Electrical Stimulation in Pigs , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  S. Grimnes,et al.  Current Threshold for Nerve Stimulation Depends on Electrical Impedance of the Tissue: A Study of Ultrasound-Guided Electrical Nerve Stimulation of the Median Nerve , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  W. Voelckel,et al.  Signs of Inflammation After Sciatic Nerve Block in Pigs , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  Jean-Baptiste Woillard,et al.  Electrical impedance to detect accidental nerve puncture during ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks , 2013, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[28]  G. Groen,et al.  Quantitative Architecture of the Brachial Plexus and Surrounding Compartments, and Their Possible Significance for Plexus Blocks , 2008, Anesthesiology.

[29]  A. Borgeat,et al.  Nerve injury and regional anaesthesia , 2004, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[30]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .