Ecophysiological responses to simulated canopy gaps of two tree species of contrasting shade tolerance in elevated CO2

1. One-year-old seedlings of shade tolerant Acer rubrum and intolerant Betula papyrifera were grown in ambient and twice ambient (elevated) CO2, and in full sun and 80% shade for 90 days. The shaded seedlings received 30-min sun patches twice during the course of the day. Gas exchange and tissue–water relations were measured at midday in the sun plants and following 20 min of exposure to full sun in the shade plants to determine the effect of elevated CO2 on constraints to sun-patch utilization in these species. 2. Elevated CO2 had the largest stimulation of photosynthesis in B. papyrifera sun plants and A. rubrum shade plants. 3. Higher photosynthesis per unit leaf area in sun plants than in shade plants of B. papyrifera was largely owing to differences in leaf morphology. Acer rubrum exhibited sun/shade differences in photosynthesis per unit leaf mass consistent with biochemical acclimation to shade. 4.Betula papyrifera exhibited CO2 responses that would facilitate tolerance to leaf water deficits in large sun patches, including osmotic adjustment and higher transpiration and stomatal conductance at a given leaf-water potential, whereas A. rubrum exhibited large increases in photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency. 5. Results suggest that species of contrasting successional ranks respond differently to elevated CO2, in ways that are consistent with the habitats in which they typically occur.

[1]  R. Teskey,et al.  A relationship between carbon dioxide, photosynthetic efficiency and shade tolerance , 1985 .

[2]  H. Rogers,et al.  Response of plant roots to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1992 .

[3]  M. Abrams,et al.  Seasonal ecophysiology and leaf morphology of four successional Pennsylvania barrens species in open versus understory environments , 1993 .

[4]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Effects of elevated CO(2) and light availability on the photosynthetic light response of trees of contrasting shade tolerance. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[5]  J. Seiler,et al.  Fraser fir seedling gas exchange and growth in response to elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[6]  J. Bunce.  Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide , 1992 .

[7]  W. Smith,et al.  Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight , 1990 .

[8]  John D. Alexander,et al.  Plant water relations and the effects of elevated CO2: a review and suggestions for future research , 1993 .

[9]  P. Curtis,et al.  Seasonal responses of leaf gas exchange to elevated carbon dioxide in Populusgrandidentata , 1992 .

[10]  R. Sage,et al.  A Model Describing the Regulation of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Electron Transport, and Triose Phosphate Use in Response to Light Intensity and CO(2) in C(3) Plants. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[11]  B. Joyce,et al.  Systematic variation in xylem hydraulic capacity within the crown of white ash (Fraxinus americana). , 1995, Tree physiology.

[12]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Foliar gas exchange responses of two deciduous hardwoods during 3 years of growth in elevated CO2: no loss of photosynthetic enhancement , 1993 .

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Determination of the Volumetric Modulus of Elasticity of Wheat Leaves by Pressure-Volume Relations and the Effect of Drought Conditioning 1 , 1982 .

[14]  M. Abrams,et al.  Photosynthesis and water relations during drought in Acer rubrum L. genotypes from contrasting sites in central Pennsylvania , 1990 .

[15]  P. Curtis,et al.  Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots , 1995 .

[16]  J. Conroy,et al.  Influence of Drought Acclimation and CO(2) Enrichment on Osmotic Adjustment and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence of Sunflower during Drought. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[17]  P. Curtis,et al.  Leaf gas exchange and nitrogen dynamics of N2‐fixing, field‐grown Alnus glutinosa under elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1995 .

[18]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .

[19]  M. Abrams,et al.  Gas exchange, leaf structure and nitrogen in contrasting successional tree species growing in open and understory sites during a drought. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[20]  J. Coleman,et al.  Growth responses of seven major co-occurring tree species of the northeastern United States to elevated CO2 , 1990 .

[21]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity* , 1990 .

[22]  J. Townend,et al.  Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and drought on the growth and physiology of clonal Sitka spruce plants (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). , 1993, Tree physiology.

[23]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Successional Status, Seed Size, and Responses of Tree Seedlings to CO^2, Light, and Nutrients , 1993 .

[24]  M. Abrams,et al.  Relating Wet and Dry Year Ecophysiology to Leaf Structure in Contrasting Temperate Tree Species , 1994 .

[25]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants , 1994 .

[26]  Robin L. Chazdon,et al.  Sunflecks and Their Importance to Forest Understorey Plants , 1988 .

[27]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta‐analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide , 1996 .

[28]  F. I. Woodward,et al.  Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels , 1987, Nature.

[29]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Effects of CO2 Enrichment on Four Poplar Clones. II. Leaf Surface Properties , 1990 .

[30]  Response of plants to CO2 under water limited conditions , 1993 .