In recent years, academic departments, industrial research laboratories and government agencies have appeared to offer dramatically increasing numbers of postdoctoral positions in computer science and engineering [CRA 2011]. In particular, data from the Computing Research Association’s (CRA) annual Taulbee Survey indicate that the numbers of recent Ph.D.s pursuing postdocs following graduate school soared from 60 in 1998 to 249 in 2011 (three-year rolling averages), an increase of 315 percent during this period. Because research organizations are suddenly channeling many more young researchers into these positions, it is incumbent upon us as a community to have a clear understanding of the best practices associated with pursuing, hosting, and nurturing postdocs. The intent of this white paper is to articulate these best practices for the several constituencies involved. We make recommendations for the expectations for a postdoc, the duties of the advisor who directly supervises the postdoc, and the responsibilities of the host organization. We also suggest a supporting role that the Ph.D. advisor might play. Importantly, there are roles and responsibilities for each of these constituencies before, during and after a postdoctoral experience.
[1]
Kendall Powell,et al.
The Postdoc Experience: High Expectations, Grounded In Reality
,
2012
.
[2]
J. Austin,et al.
Planning Career Paths for Ph.D.s
,
2012,
Science.
[3]
Anita Jones.
The explosive growth of postdocs in computer science
,
2013,
CACM.
[4]
Michael J. Singer,et al.
Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers
,
2001
.
[5]
A. Leshner,et al.
Standards for Postdoc Training
,
2012,
Science.
[6]
Neal Sweeney.
Postdocs: the power of unions.
,
2012,
Science.
[7]
Pramodita Sharma.
2012
,
2013,
Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.