Evaluation of the Workplace Environment in the UK, and the Impact on Users’ Levels of Stimulation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a number of recently completed workplaces in the UK. The first aim is to assess the impact of various aspects of the workplace environment on users’ levels of stimulation. The body of previous research undertaken into the workplace environment, identified the aspects to be investigated. Samples of employees from the sixteen businesses were surveyed to determine their perceptions of the workplaces. The results were entered into a regression analysis, and the most significant predictors of perceived stimulation identified. The data also revealed a dramatic reduction in staff arousal levels from mornings to afternoons. Thus, there is a second aim to determine whether changes to significant aspects of the workplace environment during the day can counteract the reduction in users’ stimulation. Two further workplaces were studied to enable changes to be made over a 12-week period. A sample of employees completed questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews revealed the reasons behind the results. It was found that provision of artwork, personal control of temperature and ventilation and regular breaks were the most significant contributions to increasing stimulation after lunch; while user choice of layout, and design and décor of workspaces and break areas, were the most significant aspects at design stage.

[1]  Françoise Szigeti,et al.  The turning point for linking briefing and POE? , 2002 .

[2]  Hazim B. Awbi,et al.  Evaluation of thermal comfort and indoor air quality in offices , 1992 .

[3]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments , 1997 .

[4]  M. Christie,et al.  Psychophysiological investigations of post lunch state in male and female subjects. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[5]  Cheri Ostroff.  The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[6]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Work Places: The Psychology of the Physical Environment in Offices and Factories , 1986 .

[7]  K. Smolders,et al.  Need for recovery in offices : behavior-based assessment , 2012 .

[8]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe occupant surveys and their implications , 2001 .

[9]  Francis Duffy,et al.  New Environments for Working , 1998 .

[10]  Taeyon Hwang,et al.  Effects of Indoor Lighting on Occupants’ Visual Comfort and Eye Health in a Green Building , 2011 .

[11]  ed. Duffy,et al.  The Changing Workplace , 1991 .

[12]  W. Chiles.  EFFECTS OF ELEVATED TEMPERATURES ON PERFORMANCE OF A COMPLEX MENTAL TASK , 1958 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[14]  Peter Boyce.  Users' attitudes to some types of local lighting , 1979 .

[15]  Michael Brill,et al.  Using office design to increase productivity , 1984 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[17]  V Hongisto,et al.  Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation , 2009, Ergonomics.

[18]  P Murtagh,et al.  Are you in control? , 1981, The Journal of micrographics.

[19]  N. Kwallek,et al.  Effects of environmental colour on males and females: a red or white or green office. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  A. M. Ludlow.  The functions of windows in buildings , 1976 .

[21]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Psychology of Perception , 1957 .

[22]  E. Ne'Eman,et al.  Critical minimum acceptable window size: a study of window design and provision of a view , 1970 .

[23]  Naoe Nishihara,et al.  Indoor Temperature, Productivity, and Fatigue in Office Tasks , 2006 .

[24]  Elke Gossauer,et al.  Nutzerzufriedenheit und Komfort am Arbeitsplatz – Ergebnisse einer Feldstudie in Bürogebäuden , 2008 .

[25]  Finn Levy,et al.  The Effect of Indoor Foliage Plants on Health and Discomfort Symptoms among Office Workers , 1998 .

[26]  J Rutenfranz,et al.  12 and 24 h Rhythms in error frequency of locomotive drivers and the influence of tiredness. , 1974, International journal of chronobiology.

[27]  Seiji Shibata,et al.  Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[28]  Gail Brager,et al.  Expectations of indoor climate control , 1996 .

[29]  M. David Egan,et al.  Concepts in thermal comfort , 1975 .

[30]  Jan Dul,et al.  Business Ergonomics beyond Health and Safety: Work Environments For Employee Productivity, Creativity And Innovation , 2009 .

[31]  K. J. Anderson,et al.  Impulsitivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: A within-subjects test of the Yerkes-Dodson law , 1994 .

[32]  E. C. Keighley.  Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in office buildings — A study of window shape , 1973 .

[33]  Byron W. Jones.  Capabilities and limitations of thermal models for use in thermal comfort standards , 2002 .

[34]  Larissa Larsen,et al.  Plants in the Workplace , 1998 .

[35]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Status Demarcation in the Office , 1982 .

[36]  H. G. Lorsch,et al.  The impact of the indoor environment on occupant productivity - Part 2:Effects of temperature , 1994 .

[37]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  AN ERGONOMIC EVALUATION OF OFFICE CHAIRS , 1987 .

[38]  Thomas A. Markus.  Does the building industry suffer from collective amnesia? , 2001 .

[39]  Nancy J. Stone,et al.  Environmental view and color for a simulated telemarketing task , 2003 .

[40]  Paul E. Spector.  Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[41]  Philomena M. Bluyssen,et al.  Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project , 2010 .

[42]  R. D. Lineberger,et al.  The Effect of Live Plants and Window Views of Green Spaces on Employee Perceptions of Job Satisfaction , 2008 .

[43]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[44]  J. Roscoe.  Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2004 .

[45]  S P Banbury,et al.  Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements , 2005, Ergonomics.

[46]  A P Smith,et al.  The combined effects of occupational health hazards: an experimental investigation of the effects of noise, nightwork and meals , 1987, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[47]  J. Burger.  Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. , 1989 .

[48]  R. Dedear.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[49]  Peter Colquhoun,et al.  Rhythms in Performance , 1981 .

[50]  Paul M. Biner,et al.  Effects of Lighting-Induced Arousal on the Magnitude of Goal Valence , 1991 .

[51]  Ahmet Çakir,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Grete Grindal Patil,et al.  Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into Context , 2007 .

[53]  E. Rowlands,et al.  The art and science of lighting: A strategy for lighting design , 1996 .

[54]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[55]  G. Newsham,et al.  Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: a field study , 2009 .

[56]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process , 2001 .

[57]  Martin Stopford,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting , 2003 .

[58]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[59]  R. Hockey.  Stress and fatigue in human performance , 1984 .