Recognizing approaching walkers: Neural decoding of person familiarity in cortical areas responsive to faces, bodies, and biological motion

Abstract In natural viewing environments, we recognize other people as they move through the world. Behavioral studies indicate that the face, body, and gait all contribute to recognition. We examined the neural basis of person recognition using a decoding approach aimed at discriminating the patterns of neural activity elicited in response to seeing visually familiar versus unfamiliar people in motion. Participants learned 30 identities by viewing multiple videos of the people in action. Recognition was tested inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner using 8‐s videos of 60 people (30 learned and 30 novel) approaching from a distance (˜13 m). Full brain images were taken while participants watched the approach. These images captured neural activity at four time points (TRs) corresponding to progressively closer views of the walker. We used pattern classification techniques to examine familiarity decoding in lateralized ROIs and the combination of left and right (bilateral) regions. Results showed accurate decoding of familiarity at the farthest distance in the bilateral posterior superior temporal sulcus (bpSTS). At a closer distance, familiarity was decoded in the bilateral extrastriate body area (bEBA) and left fusiform body area (lFBA). The most robust decoding was found in the time window during which the average behavioral recognition decision was made – and when the face came into clearer view. Multiple regions, including the right occipital face area (rOFA), bOFA, bFBA, bpSTS, and broadly distributed face‐ and body‐selective voxels in the ventral temporal cortex decoded walker familiarity in this time window. At the closest distance, the lFBA decoded familiarity. These results reveal a broad system of ventral and dorsal visual areas that support person recognition from face, body, and gait. Although the face has been the focus of most person recognition studies, these findings remind us of the evolutionary advantage of being able to differentiate the people we know from strangers at a safe distance. HighlightsNeurally decoded familiarity of walkers in ventral and dorsal visual stream ROIs.Neural decoding occurred when walkers were most distant in the dorsal stream pSTS.Face‐ and body‐selective regions decoded familiarity: bEBA, lFBA, rOFA, bOFA.Interactions among collections of face‐ and body‐selective voxels for recognition.Widespread neural network signals the familiarity of a person in motion.

[1]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Reprint of: The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Carina A. Hahn,et al.  Dissecting the time course of person recognition in natural viewing environments. , 2016, British journal of psychology.

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Neural Systems Underlying the Recognition of Familiar and Newly Learned Faces , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Dissociation between overt and unconscious face processing in fusiform face area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Neural correlates of own- and other-race face perception: Spatial and temporal response differences , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  Learning the Moves: The Effect of Familiarity and Facial Motion on Person Recognition across Large Changes in Viewing Format , 2006, Perception.

[9]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S. Stevenage,et al.  Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity , 1999 .

[11]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The relative importance of heads, bodies, and movement to person recognition across development. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  Walsh,et al.  Combined TMS/fMRI reveals dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static faces , 2014 .

[13]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  B. Gelder,et al.  Emotional information in body and background hampers recognition memory for faces , 2012, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[15]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Distinct Neural Mechanisms for Body Form and Body Motion Discriminations , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Kohki Yoshikawa,et al.  Neural substrates for the recognition of newly learned faces: a functional MRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  D. Perrett,et al.  Looking Like a Leader–Facial Shape Predicts Perceived Height and Leadership Ability , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  Unaware Person Recognition From the Body When Face Identification Fails , 2013, Psychological science.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[21]  Galit Yovel,et al.  An Integrated Face–Body Representation in the Fusiform Gyrus but Not the Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Dissociable Neural Patterns of Facial Identity across Changes in Viewpoint , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Koen Van Laere,et al.  A strange face in the mirror. Face-selective self-misidentification in a patient with right lateralized occipito-temporal hypo-metabolism , 2012, Cortex.

[24]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Biological motion task performance predicts superior temporal sulcus activity , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[26]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[28]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[29]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The Role of the Face and Body in Unfamiliar Person Identification , 2013 .

[30]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Bodies are Represented as Wholes Rather Than Their Sum of Parts in the Occipital-Temporal Cortex. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  Distinct cortical networks for the detection and identification of human body , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Frances Crabbe,et al.  Body-selective areas in the visual cortex are less active in children than in adults , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate Face and Body Selectivity on the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: Dissecting identity with a fusion approach , 2010 .

[39]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  A video database of moving faces and people , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[40]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity , 2015, NeuroImage.

[43]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[44]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Combined TMS and fMRI Reveal Dissociable Cortical Pathways for Dynamic and Static Face Perception , 2014, Current Biology.

[45]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Recognizing People in Motion , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Walk this way: Approaching bodies can influence the processing of faces , 2011, Cognition.

[47]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[48]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Novel vs. Well-learned Memory for Faces: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Two Critical and Functionally Distinct Stages of Face and Body Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Differential amygdalar response to novel versus newly familiar neutral faces: a functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[51]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Neural substrates participating in acquisition of facial familiarity: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[52]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Koen Van Laere,et al.  Face-selective hyper-animacy and hyper-familiarity misperception in a patient with moderate Alzheimer's disease. , 2013, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[55]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  How affective information from faces and scenes interacts in the brain. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[57]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Seeing People in Motion Enhances Person Recognition. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[58]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Time course of person recognition in a naturalistic environment , 2013 .

[59]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  The neural representation of faces and bodies in motion and at rest , 2014, NeuroImage.

[60]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[61]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[62]  P. Downing,et al.  Within‐subject reproducibility of category‐specific visual activation with functional MRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[64]  Joset A. Etzel,et al.  MVPA Permutation Schemes: Permutation Testing for the Group Level , 2015, 2015 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging.

[65]  Maria A. Bobes,et al.  Timing and Tuning for Familiarity of Cortical Responses to Faces , 2013, PloS one.

[66]  M. Crommelinck,et al.  Effect of Familiarity on the Processing of Human Faces , 1999, NeuroImage.