Towards a Conceptual Framework for Social-Ecological Systems Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services with Resource Efficiency Indicators

In this article we develop a comprehensive conceptual framework for resource efficiency indicators with a consistent link of resource use to the socio-economic system and activities therein as well as to the natural system and its ecosystem functioning. Three broad groups of indicators are defined: (1) resource use indicators representing pressures on the environment; (2) resource efficiency indicators relating resource use indicators to the socio-economic side; and (3) environmental impact indicators linking resource use impacts on the state of the natural system. Based on this conceptual framework we develop a structure for possible resource efficiency indicators and conduct a RACER evaluation on the Relevance, Acceptance, Credibility, Easiness and Robustness of indicators. With the RACER evaluation, we identify areas where indicators are well established and available as well as areas where indicators still need further development or even need to be designed first.

[1]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Changes in ecosystem processes induced by land use: Human appropriation of aboveground NPP and its influence on standing crop in Austria , 2001 .

[3]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer , 2004 .

[4]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012 , 2013 .

[5]  R Wilkinson,et al.  Productivity and the environment. , 1970, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  S. Suh,et al.  The material footprint of nations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Energetic Metabolism of the European Union and the United States: Decadal Energy Input Time‐Series with an Emphasis on Biomass , 2006 .

[9]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[10]  C. Lindblad,et al.  Aichi Biodiversity Targets , 2016 .

[11]  Eugenie C. Regan,et al.  A framework to identify enabling and urgent actions for the 2020 Aichi Targets , 2014 .

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[13]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Energetic Metabolism of Societies Part I: Accounting Concepts , 2001 .

[14]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  W. Leontief.  Input-output economics , 1967 .

[16]  T. Foxon.  A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[17]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Society's Metabolism , 1998 .

[18]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[19]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[20]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Sustainable growth and resource productivity : economic and global policy issues , 2009 .

[21]  Hans Bruyninckx,et al.  Upscaling transition governance. An exploratory analysis of the Roadmap to a Resource‐Efficient Europe , 2012 .

[22]  Helga Weisz,et al.  SOCIETY AS HYBRID BETWEEN MATERIAL AND SYMBOLIC REALMS : TOWARD A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF SOCIETY-NATURE INTERACTION , 2006 .

[23]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[24]  Helga Weisz,et al.  The probability of the improbable: society–nature coevolution , 2011 .

[25]  Cbd.  Aichi biodiversity targets , 2016 .

[26]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies , 2015 .

[27]  Karlson Hargroves,et al.  Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity , 2009 .

[28]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint , 2014, Science.

[29]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets , 2014, Science.

[30]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Towards a set of indicators on sustainable consumption and production (SCP) for EEA reporting , 2012 .

[31]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary production — processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction☆ , 2009 .

[32]  S. Giljum,et al.  Desire. Development of a system of indicators for a resource efficient europe. D5.1 Inception report , 2013 .

[33]  Paul H. Brunner,et al.  Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation, Design , 2012 .

[34]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services : Draft Final Report , 2009 .

[35]  Dagmar Schröter,et al.  Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use , 2009 .

[36]  M. Swilling,et al.  Decoupling : natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth , 2011 .

[37]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .

[38]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth , 2011 .

[39]  L. Hein,et al.  Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway , 2014 .

[40]  Helen Wallace,et al.  The Council and the European Parliament , 1997 .

[41]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators , 2015 .

[42]  E. Bennett,et al.  Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery , 2013 .

[43]  H. Weisz,et al.  Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting , 2011 .

[44]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  A Handbook of Industrial Ecology , 2002 .

[45]  P. Gleick,et al.  Systems integration for global sustainability , 2015, Science.

[46]  Maes Joachim,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services , 2013 .

[47]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Sustainable development: socio‐economic metabolism and colonization of nature , 1998 .

[48]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  S. Suh.  Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology , 2009 .

[50]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern , 2006 .

[51]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms , 2009 .

[52]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The environmental sustainability of nations. Benchmarking the carbon, water and land footprints against allocated planetary boundaries , 2015 .

[53]  G. Mace,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.