Estimating Fishing Vessel Capacity: A Comparison of Nonparametric Frontier Approaches

Abstract Fishing capacity has been an important national and international topic for over a decade. Led by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), an international effort was undertaken in 1998 to define and measure fishing capacity, during which three methods to measure fishing capacity were identified–data envelopment analysis (DEA), stochastic production frontiers (SPF), and the peak-to-peak approach. Most estimates of capacity have been carried out using DEA. This study introduces “order-m” frontiers and the free disposal hull (FDH) as additional methods to estimate fishing capacity, and compares capacity estimates for a group of fishing vessels based on the DEA, FDH, and order-m models. Our results show a large difference between capacity estimates using DEA when compared to the other two methods. JEL Classification Codes: Q22, D24

[1]  John Walden,et al.  A Limited Economic Assessment of the Northeast Groundfish Fishery Buyout Program , 2003, Land Economics.

[2]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research , 2004 .

[3]  Lawrence R. Klein,et al.  Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity , 1960 .

[4]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[5]  N. Vestergaard,et al.  Measuring capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries: the case of the Danish Gill-net fleet , 2003 .

[6]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Introducing Environmental Variables in Nonparametric Frontier Models: a Probabilistic Approach , 2005 .

[7]  Erik Lindebo Multi-national Industry Capacity in the North Sea Flatfish Fishery , 2005, Marine Resource Economics.

[8]  J. Florens,et al.  Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach , 2002 .

[9]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[10]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  What Is the Economic Meaning of FDH? , 1999 .

[11]  Quinn Weninger,et al.  Economic Benefits of Management Reform in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Fishery , 2003 .

[12]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[13]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Non-convex Technologies and Cost Functions: Definitions, Duality and Nonparametric Tests of Convexity , 2004 .

[14]  Leâ Opold Simar,et al.  A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models , 2000 .

[15]  Robert J. Hill,et al.  Identifying Outliers in Multi-Output Models , 2004 .

[16]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[17]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  The Existence of Plant Capacity , 1984 .

[19]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Detecting Outliers in Frontier Models: A Simple Approach , 2003 .

[20]  R. Färe,et al.  Estimating Capacity and Efficiency in Fisheries with Undesirable Outputs , 2007 .

[21]  Dominique Gréboval Managing Fishing Capacity: Selected Papers on Underlying Concepts and Issues , 1999 .

[22]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[23]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[24]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The Application of Mathematical Programming Approaches to Estimating Container Port Production Efficiency , 2005 .

[25]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .