Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis

Abstract The area of teachers' continuing professional development (CPD) is of growing interest internationally. However, while an increasing range of literature focuses on particular aspects of CPD, there is a paucity of literature addressing the spectrum of CPD models in a comparative manner. This article therefore considers a wide range of international literature, together with some specific examples from the Scottish context, in proposing a framework built around key characteristics of individual models of CPD. The framework identifies nine key models, which are then classified in relation to their capacity for supporting professional autonomy and transformative practice. The article considers the circumstances in which each of the nine models of CPD might be adopted, and explores the form(s) of knowledge that can be developed through any particular model. It also examines the power relationships inherent in the individual models and explores the extent to which CPD is perceived and promoted either as an individual endeavour related to accountability, or as a collaborative endeavour that supports transformative practice. Finally, it is argued that there is a need for greater interrogation of both the purpose and the potential outcomes of CPD structures - the framework outlined in this article is offered as one way of supporting such analysis.

[1]  Mary D. Burbank,et al.  An alternative model for professional development: investigations into effective collaboration , 2003 .

[2]  David Clutterbuck,et al.  Everyone Needs A Mentor , 2001 .

[3]  J. O’Brien,et al.  First Impressions: the new teacher induction arrangements in Scotland , 2004 .

[4]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  M. Eraut.  Developing professional knowledge and competence , 1994 .

[6]  N. Boreham.  A Theory of Collective Competence: Challenging The Neo-Liberal Individualisation of Performance at Work , 2004 .

[7]  J. Sachs.  The Activist Teaching Profession , 2003 .

[8]  Landon E. Beyer.  The Politics of Standardization: Teacher education in the USA , 2002 .

[9]  Christopher Rhodes,et al.  Coaching, mentoring and peer-networking: challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools , 2002 .

[10]  Christopher Rhodes,et al.  Professional development support for poorly performing teachers: challenges and opportunities for school managers in addressing teacher learning needs , 2003 .

[11]  Ronald J. Anson.  Systemic Reform: Perspectives on Personalizing Education. , 1994 .

[12]  Christopher Day,et al.  Developing Teachers : The Challenges of Lifelong Learning , 2002 .

[13]  Foster,et al.  Medical students’ errors in pharmacotherapeutics , 2000, Medical education.

[14]  P. Kelly,et al.  Decentralisation of professional development: teachers' decisions and dilemmas , 2002 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Sonia Nieto,et al.  Challenging Current Notions of “Highly Qualified Teachers” through Work in a Teachers’ Inquiry Group , 2003 .

[17]  J. Solomon,et al.  A model for continued professional development: knowledge, belief and action , 1999 .

[18]  Aileen Purdon.  A national framework of CPD: continuing professional development or continuing policy dominance? , 2003 .

[19]  T. Wubbels,et al.  The Professional Development of Teachers , 2000 .