Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hak Seung Lee | Jiyan Chen | J. M. Lee | B. Koo | J. Doh | Yundai Chen | C. Nam | E. Shin | A. Yong | M. Ng | K. Yiu | N. Johnson | A. Mullasari | P. Chandra | R. Mathew | Kuang-Te Wang | D. Tresukosol | Neng Dai | J. Lee | Ji-yan Chen | N. Dai | H. Lee
[1] M. Tomaniak,et al. Alternative methods for functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. , 2020, Cardiology journal.
[2] A. Jeremias,et al. Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the Resting Full-cycle Ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. , 2018, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[3] P. Jüni,et al. Considerations for the choice between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention as revascularization strategies in major categories of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease: an accompanying article of the task force of the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on , 2018, European heart journal.
[4] B. Koo,et al. Coronary Psychology: Do You Believe? , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[5] G. Rioufol,et al. Five‐Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.
[6] S. Kische,et al. Impact of Routine Invasive Physiology at Time of Angiography in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease on Reclassification of Revascularization Strategy: Results From the DEFINE REAL Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[7] J. M. Lee,et al. Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice , 2018, Korean circulation journal.
[8] G. Stone,et al. Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] G. Cheon,et al. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure , 2017, Circulation.
[10] K. Choi,et al. Similarity and Difference of Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] J. M. Lee,et al. Discrepancy between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: Clinical and angiographic characteristics. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.
[12] J. M. Lee,et al. Clinical Outcomes According to Fractional Flow Reserve or Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Deferred Lesions. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[13] B. Koo,et al. Physiologic mechanism of discordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve: Insight from 13N-ammonium positron emission tomography. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.
[14] T. Hong,et al. Fractional Flow Reserve and Cardiac Events in Coronary Artery Disease: Data From a Prospective IRIS-FFR Registry (Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society Fractional Flow Reserve) , 2017, Circulation.
[15] Jun-Jie Zhang,et al. Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[16] Michael Haude,et al. Current trends in coronary interventions: an overview from the EAPCI registries. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[17] A. Jeremias,et al. Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[18] E. Omerovic,et al. Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[19] G. Lau,et al. The uptake of coronary fractional flow reserve in Australia in the past decade , 2016, The Medical journal of Australia.
[20] M. Toyofuku,et al. Safety and efficacy of intracoronary nicorandil as hyperaemic agent for invasive physiological assessment: a patient-level pooled analysis. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[21] J. M. Lee,et al. Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] Sang Hyun Park,et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Versus Routine Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[23] P. Stella,et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. , 2015, European heart journal.
[24] H. Krumholz,et al. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2015, JAMA.
[25] J. Escaned,et al. Integrated Physiologic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Real-World Practice Using Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve: Insights From the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions.
[26] L. Køber,et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.
[27] C. V. van Mieghem,et al. Revascularization Decisions in Patients With Stable Angina and Intermediate Lesions: Results of the International Survey on Interventional Strategy , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[28] William Wijns,et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. , 2014, European heart journal.
[29] A. Briggs,et al. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS–NSTEMI randomized trial , 2014, European heart journal.
[30] B. Dimitrov,et al. Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?: The RIPCORD Study , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[31] G. Rioufol,et al. Outcome Impact of Coronary Revascularization Strategy Reclassification With Fractional Flow Reserve at Time of Diagnostic Angiography: Insights From a Large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry , 2014, Circulation.
[32] K. Park,et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel hyperaemic agent, intracoronary nicorandil, for invasive physiological assessments in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 2013, European heart journal.
[33] J. Dery,et al. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization. , 2008, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.
[34] Young-Seok Cho,et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2008, European heart journal.
[35] Young‐Bae Park,et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[36] S. Koyanagi,et al. Coronary disease morphology and distribution determined by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound--re-evaluation in a cooperative multicenter intravascular ultrasound study (COMIUS). , 2002, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.
[37] P. H. van der Voort,et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.
[38] E. Topol,et al. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.
[39] B. De Bruyne,et al. Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.
[40] W. Siegenthaler,et al. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.
[41] T. Nealon. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery , 1972 .
[42] Z. Ali,et al. Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR Are They All Equal? , 2017 .
[43] G. Thanassoulis,et al. Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[44] T. Akasaka,et al. Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry , 2014, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.