Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries

Background Currently, invasive physiologic assessment such as fractional flow reserve is widely used worldwide with different adoption rates around the globe. Patient characteristics and physician preferences often differ in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with respect to treatment strategy, techniques, lesion complexity, access to coronary physiology and imaging devices, as well as patient management. Thus, there is a need to construct a consensus document on recommendations for use of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in APAC populations. This document serves as an overview of recommendations describing the best practices for APAC populations to achieve more consistent and optimal clinical outcomes. Methods and Results A comprehensive multiple-choice questionnaire was provided to 20 interventional cardiologists from 10 countries in the APAC region. Clinical evidence, tips and techniques, and clinical situations for the use of physiology-guided PCI in APAC were reviewed and used to propose key recommendations. There are suggestions to continue to develop evidence for lesion and patient types that will benefit from physiology, develop directions for future research in health economics and local data, develop appropriate use criteria in different countries, and emphasize the importance of education of all stakeholders. A consensus recommendation to enhance the penetration of invasive physiology-based therapy was to adopt the 5E approach: Evidence, Education, Expand hardware, Economics and Expert consensus. Conclusions This consensus document and recommendations support interventional fellows and cardiologists, hospital administrators, patients, and medical device companies to build confidence and encourage wider implementation of invasive coronary physiology-guided therapy in the APAC region.

[1]  M. Tomaniak,et al.  Alternative methods for functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. , 2020, Cardiology journal.

[2]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the Resting Full-cycle Ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. , 2018, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  P. Jüni,et al.  Considerations for the choice between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention as revascularization strategies in major categories of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease: an accompanying article of the task force of the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on , 2018, European heart journal.

[4]  B. Koo,et al.  Coronary Psychology: Do You Believe? , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  G. Rioufol,et al.  Five‐Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Kische,et al.  Impact of Routine Invasive Physiology at Time of Angiography in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease on Reclassification of Revascularization Strategy: Results From the DEFINE REAL Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice , 2018, Korean circulation journal.

[8]  G. Stone,et al.  Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  G. Cheon,et al.  Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure , 2017, Circulation.

[10]  K. Choi,et al.  Similarity and Difference of Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Discrepancy between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: Clinical and angiographic characteristics. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Clinical Outcomes According to Fractional Flow Reserve or Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Deferred Lesions. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  B. Koo,et al.  Physiologic mechanism of discordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve: Insight from 13N-ammonium positron emission tomography. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  T. Hong,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve and Cardiac Events in Coronary Artery Disease: Data From a Prospective IRIS-FFR Registry (Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society Fractional Flow Reserve) , 2017, Circulation.

[15]  Jun-Jie Zhang,et al.  Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Michael Haude,et al.  Current trends in coronary interventions: an overview from the EAPCI registries. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  E. Omerovic,et al.  Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  G. Lau,et al.  The uptake of coronary fractional flow reserve in Australia in the past decade , 2016, The Medical journal of Australia.

[20]  M. Toyofuku,et al.  Safety and efficacy of intracoronary nicorandil as hyperaemic agent for invasive physiological assessment: a patient-level pooled analysis. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Sang Hyun Park,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Versus Routine Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[23]  P. Stella,et al.  Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. , 2015, European heart journal.

[24]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2015, JAMA.

[25]  J. Escaned,et al.  Integrated Physiologic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Real-World Practice Using Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve: Insights From the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions.

[26]  L. Køber,et al.  Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[27]  C. V. van Mieghem,et al.  Revascularization Decisions in Patients With Stable Angina and Intermediate Lesions: Results of the International Survey on Interventional Strategy , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[28]  William Wijns,et al.  Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. , 2014, European heart journal.

[29]  A. Briggs,et al.  Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS–NSTEMI randomized trial , 2014, European heart journal.

[30]  B. Dimitrov,et al.  Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?: The RIPCORD Study , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[31]  G. Rioufol,et al.  Outcome Impact of Coronary Revascularization Strategy Reclassification With Fractional Flow Reserve at Time of Diagnostic Angiography: Insights From a Large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry , 2014, Circulation.

[32]  K. Park,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a novel hyperaemic agent, intracoronary nicorandil, for invasive physiological assessments in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 2013, European heart journal.

[33]  J. Dery,et al.  Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization. , 2008, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[34]  Young-Seok Cho,et al.  Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2008, European heart journal.

[35]  Young‐Bae Park,et al.  Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  S. Koyanagi,et al.  Coronary disease morphology and distribution determined by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound--re-evaluation in a cooperative multicenter intravascular ultrasound study (COMIUS). , 2002, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[37]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[38]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[39]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[40]  W. Siegenthaler,et al.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  T. Nealon The American Association for Thoracic Surgery , 1972 .

[42]  Z. Ali,et al.  Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR Are They All Equal? , 2017 .

[43]  G. Thanassoulis,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry , 2014, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.