Impact of Early Weightbearing After Ankle Arthroscopy and Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Background: Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) may be caused by osteochondritis dissecans, osteochondral fractures, avascular necrosis, or focal arthritic changes. For certain focal cartilage defects, bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been a widely used technique to restore a fibrocartilage substitute overlying the defect. There are various postoperative weightbearing protocols for this procedure, with no single gold standard method. Purpose: To retrospectively review the outcomes of patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy with concomitant BMS to determine outcomes based on postoperative weightbearing status. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy with BMS for OLTs between 2015 and 2018. Patients were placed into 2 cohorts based on postoperative immobilization status: the nonweightbearing (NWB) group and the weightbearing-as-tolerated (WBAT) group. Patient characteristics obtained included age, sex, comorbidities, and etiology of talar pathology. Outcomes included the pain visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), complications, time to first weightbearing, and the method and length of immobilization. Patients who were lost to follow-up before 30 days were excluded. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between cohorts, and the t test was used for continuous variables. Results: A total of 69 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, 18 in the WBAT group and 51 in the NWB group. The mean lesion size was 9.48 × 9.21 mm (range, 3-15 mm × 2-20 mm) for the NWB group and 9.36 × 9.72 mm (range, 5-14 mm × 6-20 mm) for the WBAT group (P > .05). The VAS scores improved from 4.40 to 0.67 for the WBAT group and from 6.33 to 2.55 for the NWB group, with the difference in final values reaching statistical significance (P = .0002). Postoperative ROM was not significantly different between the groups. There were 4 repeat operations within the NWB cohort. Conclusion: The surgical management of OLTs can be challenging, and the postoperative weightbearing protocol can be an extra obstacle for the patient to navigate. We found no difference in pain, ROM, or complications when allowing immediate, full WBAT.

[1]  W. Garrett,et al.  Are Weightbearing Restrictions Required After Microfracture for Isolated Chondral Lesions of the Knee? A Review of the Basic Science and Clinical Literature , 2020, Sports health.

[2]  G. Lee,et al.  Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Functional Outcomes at a Mean of 6.7 Years in 165 Consecutive Ankles , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Chung-Hwan Chen,et al.  Current Status and Changes in Pain and Activities of Daily Living in Elderly Patients with Osteoarthritis Before and After Unilateral Total Knee Replacement Surgery , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  Patrick M. Osborn,et al.  Early vs Delayed Weightbearing After Microfracture of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Prospective Randomized Trial , 2017, Foot & ankle orthopaedics.

[5]  M. Erdil,et al.  Patient compliance with touchdown weight bearing after microfracture treatment of talar osteochondral lesions , 2017, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[6]  Yu-jie Liu,et al.  Clinical outcomes of early weight-bearing after arthroscopic microfracture during the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. , 2014, Chinese medical journal.

[7]  C. V. van Dijk,et al.  Rehabilitation and return-to-sports activity after debridement and bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral talar defects. , 2012, Sports medicine.

[8]  T. Roukis,et al.  Outcome of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture as the primary treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  J. Seon,et al.  Comparison of Early Versus Delayed Weightbearing Outcomes After Microfracture for Small to Midsized Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  T. Brown,et al.  Effect of implantation accuracy on ankle contact mechanics with a metallic focal resurfacing implant. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  K. Briggs,et al.  Rehabilitation following microfracture for chondral injury in the knee. , 2010, Clinics in sports medicine.

[12]  G. Onambélé-Pearson,et al.  Effect of Foot and Ankle Immobilization on Leg and Thigh Muscles' Volume and Morphology: A Case Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Anatomical record.

[13]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Contribution of articular surface geometry to ankle stabilization. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Tensile Engagement of the Peri-Ankle Ligaments in Stance Phase , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[15]  R. Marder,et al.  Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[16]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Ochi,et al.  Arthroscopic drilling for chondral, subchondral, and combined chondral-subchondral lesions of the talar dome. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  K. Vandenborne,et al.  Effects of immobilization on plantar-flexion torque, fatigue resistance, and functional ability following an ankle fracture. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[19]  R. Teasell,et al.  Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 1: Musculoskeletal and cardiovascular complications. , 1993, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[20]  K. An,et al.  Stability of the loaded ankle , 1985, The American journal of sports medicine.