Pathways of change explaining the effect of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in The Netherlands. An application of the international tobacco control conceptual model.

INTRODUCTION This study aims to test the pathways of change from individual exposure to smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation, as hypothesized in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Conceptual Model. METHODS A nationally representative sample of Dutch smokers aged 15 years and older was surveyed during 4 consecutive annual surveys. Of the 1,820 baseline smokers, 1,012 participated in the fourth survey. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to test a model of the effects of individual exposure to smoke-free legislation through policy-specific variables (support for smoke-free legislation and awareness of the harm of [secondhand] smoking) and psychosocial mediators (attitudes, subjective norm, self-efficacy, and intention to quit) on quit attempts and quit success. RESULTS The effect of individual exposure to smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation was mediated by 1 pathway via support for smoke-free legislation, attitudes about quitting, and intention to quit smoking. Exposure to smoke-free legislation also influenced awareness of the harm of (secondhand) smoking, which in turn influenced the subjective norm about quitting. However, only attitudes about quitting were significantly associated with intention to quit smoking, whereas subjective norm and self-efficacy for quitting were not. Intention to quit predicted quit attempts and quit success, and self-efficacy for quitting predicted quit success. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the ITC Conceptual Model, which hypothesized that policies influence smoking cessation through policy-specific variables and psychosocial mediators. Smoke-free legislation may increase smoking cessation, provided that it succeeds in influencing support for the legislation.

[1]  S. Jay,et al.  Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explore the Relation Between Smoke-Free Air Laws and Quitting Intentions , 2012, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[2]  Hermann Brenner,et al.  Comprehensive smoke-free policies attract more support from smokers in Europe than partial policies. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[3]  Geoffrey T Fong,et al.  Comparative impact of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in three European countries. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[4]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Evaluation of a social marketing campaign to support Mexico City's comprehensive smoke-free law. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[5]  A. McNeill,et al.  Does the introduction of comprehensive smoke-free legislation lead to a decrease in population smoking prevalence? , 2011, Addiction.

[6]  H. de Vries,et al.  The influence of newspaper coverage and a media campaign on smokers' support for smoke-free bars and restaurants and on secondhand smoke harm awareness: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[7]  Geoffrey T Fong,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of smoking in "smoke-free" bars. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[8]  H. de Vries,et al.  The population impact of smoke-free workplace and hospitality industry legislation on smoking behaviour. Findings from a national population survey. , 2011, Addiction.

[9]  A. Woodward,et al.  Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries , 2011, The Lancet.

[10]  A. Amos,et al.  'These things don't happen in Greece': a qualitative study of Greek young people's attitudes to smoking, secondhand smoke and the smokefree legislation. , 2010, Health education research.

[11]  M. Zanna,et al.  Motivational factors predict quit attempts but not maintenance of smoking cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four country project. , 2010, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[12]  A. Hyland,et al.  Compliance and support for bans on smoking in licensed venues in Australia: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four‐Country Survey , 2010, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[13]  H. de Vries,et al.  Is web interviewing a good alternative to telephone interviewing? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey , 2010, BMC public health.

[14]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico city. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[15]  Gustavo Nigenda,et al.  Expectativas de migración internacional en estudiantes de enfermería en México, Distrito Federal , 2010 .

[16]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Differential impact of local and federal smoke-free legislation in Mexico: a longitudinal study among adult smokers. , 2010, Salud publica de Mexico.

[17]  R. Hernández,et al.  Mercadotecnia social y políticas públicas de salud: campaña para promover espacios libres de humo de tabaco en México , 2010 .

[18]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Perceived justice and popular support for public health laws: a case study around comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[19]  G. Hastings,et al.  A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[20]  Geoffrey T Fong,et al.  Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[21]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[22]  Louise M. Hassan,et al.  The impact of smokefree legislation in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC: Scotland/UK longitudinal surveys. , 2009, European journal of public health.

[23]  Robert West,et al.  Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. , 2009, Addictive behaviors.

[24]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  L. Bledsoe.  Smoking cessation: an application of theory of planned behavior to understanding progress through stages of change. , 2006, Addictive behaviors.

[26]  H de Vries,et al.  Smoking and the Ø pattern; predictors of transitions through the stages of change. , 2006, Health education research.

[27]  A Hyland,et al.  Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[28]  K. Cummings,et al.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[29]  K. Cummings,et al.  Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[30]  A Hyland,et al.  Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[31]  H de Vries,et al.  Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[32]  W. Maziak,et al.  On the gains of seeding tobacco research in developing countries , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[33]  H Darling,et al.  Tobacco advertising on mini-motors , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[34]  S. Brunsting,et al.  Social influences on smoking cessation: a comparison of the effect of six social influence variables. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[35]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[36]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Differential beliefs, perceived social influences, and self-efficacy expectations among smokers in various motivational phases. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[37]  Aart N. Mudde,et al.  Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude-social influence-efficacy model , 1998 .

[38]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[39]  R C Frecker,et al.  Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. , 1989, British journal of addiction.

[40]  L. Clancy,et al.  The road to smoke-free legislation in Ireland. , 2011, Addiction.

[41]  M. Willemsen,et al.  Sociale invloeden op stoppen met roken , 2005 .

[42]  J. Hox,et al.  An introduction to structural equation modeling , 1998 .