Interaction of eye-, head-, and trunk-bound information in spatial perception and control.

This article reviews the author's investigations on the perception and control of spatial relations if the carriers of the relevant sense organs are mobile and controlled independently of each other. In the dragonfly, head rotation is controlled by the head's inertia, as well as by cervicocollic, optokinetic, and dorsal light reflexes and, in turn, controls trunk rotation by means of neck reflexes on the wings. In humans, invariance of head-referenced visual direction under eye-to-head rotation is attained by feedforward of an efference copy. In the pigeon, invariance of responses to trunk tilt under head-to-trunk rotation is, in flight, achieved by feedforward of head-to-trunk information yielded by neck receptors. But in standing or walking, this is accomplished by means of gravity sense organs in the trunk. Such organs are also shown to exist in the human trunk by means of experiments on a sled centrifuge. From tests with paraplegic and neuromectomized subjects, it is concluded that truncal graviception 1) is not influenced by mechanoreceptors in the legs, the skin, and between the vertebrae, but 2) is affected by at least two afferent inputs, one originating in the kidneys, another in the tissues that support the large blood vessels against the gravitational load. These conclusions are corroborated by experiments with bilaterally nephrectomized subjects and by means of positive air pressure to the legs, respectively. Recent results under application of positive and negative air pressure to the entire lower body indicate that yet another source of somatic graviception may exist, for example, one that exploits the hydrostatics of blood pressure or the inertia of the mass of the abdominal viscera.

[1]  H. Mittelstaedt,et al.  Reafferenzprinzip — Apologie und Kritik , 1971 .

[2]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic versus Vestibular Gravity Reception in Man , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  The analysis of behavior in terms of control systems , 1958 .

[4]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Basic control patterns of orientational homeostasis. , 1964, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[5]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Evidence of somatic graviception from new and classical investigations. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[6]  H. E. Vongierke,et al.  Differences in otolith and abdominal viscera graviceptor dynamics: implications for motion sickness and perceived body position. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  F. Horak,et al.  Modification of human postural response to leg muscle vibration by electrical vestibular stimulation , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  D. Kostreva,et al.  Pericardial mechanoreceptors with phrenic afferents. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Basic solutions to the problem of head-centric visual localization , 1990 .

[10]  D. Kostreva,et al.  Hepatic vein, hepatic parenchymal, and inferior vena caval mechanoreceptors with phrenic afferents. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  A. Niijima Observation on the localization of mechanoreceptors in the kidney and afferent nerve fibres in the renal nerves in the rabbit. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  A. Nicogossian,et al.  Physiological effects of locally applied reduced pressure in man. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[13]  Über die Bewegung der Vögel nach Durchschneidung hinterer Rückenmarkswurzeln: Ein Beitrag zur Physiologie des Zentralnervensystems der Vögel (nach Untersuchungen an Columba domestica) , 1906 .

[14]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[15]  F. S. Musgrave,et al.  Comparison of the effects of 70 degrees tilt and several levels of lower body negative pressure on heart rate and blood pressure in man. , 1971, Aerospace medicine.

[16]  J. F. Meckel Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie , 1826 .

[17]  R. Sperry Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.