Isolation by distance, resistance and/or clusters? Lessons learned from a forest‐dwelling carnivore inhabiting a heterogeneous landscape

Landscape genetics provides a valuable framework to understand how landscape features influence gene flow and to disentangle the factors that lead to discrete and/or clinal population structure. Here, we attempt to differentiate between these processes in a forest‐dwelling small carnivore [European pine marten (Martes martes)]. Specifically, we used complementary analytical approaches to quantify the spatially explicit genetic structure and diversity and analyse patterns of gene flow for 140 individuals genotyped at 15 microsatellite loci. We first used spatially explicit and nonspatial Bayesian clustering algorithms to partition the sample into discrete clusters and evaluate hypotheses of ‘isolation by barriers’ (IBB). We further characterized the relationships between genetic distance and geographical (‘isolation by distance’, IBD) and ecological distances (‘isolation by resistance’, IBR) obtained from optimized landscape models. Using a reciprocal causal modelling approach, we competed the IBD, IBR and IBB hypotheses with each other to unravel factors driving population genetic structure. Additionally, we further assessed spatially explicit indices of genetic diversity using sGD across potentially overlapping genetic neighbourhoods that matched the inferred population structure. Our results revealed a complex spatial genetic cline that appears to be driven jointly by IBD and partial barriers to gene flow (IBB) associated with poor habitat and interspecific competition. Habitat loss and fragmentation, in synergy with past overharvesting and possible interspecific competition with sympatric stone marten (Martes foina), are likely the main factors responsible for the spatial genetic structure we observed. These results emphasize the need for a more thorough evaluation of discrete and clinal hypotheses governing gene flow in landscape genetic studies, and the potential influence of different limiting factors affecting genetic structure at different spatial scales.

[1]  E. Randi,et al.  Non-invasive genetic sampling of sympatric marten species (Martes martes and Martes foina): assessing species and individual identification success rates on faecal DNA genotyping , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[2]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data , 2004 .

[3]  S. Cushman,et al.  Simulating the effects of climate change on population connectivity of American marten (Martes americana) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  J. Birks,et al.  World Distribution and Status of the Genus Martes in 2000 , 2005 .

[5]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  A practical toolbox for design and analysis of landscape genetics studies , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  O. Hardy,et al.  New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[7]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Spatio-temporal population genetics of the Danish pine marten (Martes martes) , 2008 .

[8]  James S. Clark,et al.  Pelagic movements of pacific leatherback turtles (dermochelys coriacea) highlight the role of prey and ocean currents , 2013, Movement Ecology.

[9]  Linking habitat characteristics with genetic diversity of the European pine marten (Martes martes) in France , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[10]  Gilles Guillot,et al.  A computer program to simulate multilocus genotype data with spatially autocorrelated allele frequencies , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[11]  S. Cushman,et al.  Landscape effects on gene flow for a climate‐sensitive montane species, the American pika , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[12]  Stéphanie Manel,et al.  Ten years of landscape genetics. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  J. Helldin Population trends and harvest management of pine marten Martes martes in Scandinavia , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[14]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results , 2009, Conservation Genetics.

[15]  G. Luikart,et al.  Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[16]  O. Hardy,et al.  spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels , 2002 .

[17]  Olivier François,et al.  Spatially explicit Bayesian clustering models in population genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  P. Meirmans,et al.  The trouble with isolation by distance , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[19]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  G. Luikart,et al.  Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Landscape genetics and limiting factors , 2012, Conservation Genetics.

[22]  B. Mcrae,et al.  ISOLATION BY RESISTANCE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  G Rowe,et al.  Defining population boundaries: use of three Bayesian approaches with microsatellite data from British natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[24]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE) , 1995 .

[25]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Genetic consequences of hunting: what do we know and what should we do? , 2002 .

[26]  Terry Burke,et al.  Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance? , 2009 .

[27]  S. Cushman Pushing the envelope in genetic analysis of species invasion , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[28]  C. Prigioni,et al.  Range expansion of the pine marten (Martes martes) in an agricultural landscape matrix (NW Italy). , 2010 .

[29]  P. J. Lozano,et al.  GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning , 2010 .

[30]  P. Beerli,et al.  Effect of unsampled populations on the estimation of population sizes and migration rates between sampled populations , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[31]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  A Spatial Statistical Model for Landscape Genetics , 2005, Genetics.

[32]  R. Petit,et al.  Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[33]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation , 2008 .

[34]  F. Rousset genepop’007: a complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[35]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. , 1996 .

[36]  Craig R. Miller,et al.  Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. , 2002, Genetics.

[37]  Melanie Murphy,et al.  A simulation‐based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.

[38]  F. Burel,et al.  Dispersal and genetic structure in the American marten, Martes americana , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[39]  G. Luikart,et al.  Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data , 1999 .

[40]  Erin L. Landguth,et al.  Evaluating sample allocation and effort in detecting population differentiation for discrete and continuously distributed individuals , 2014, Conservation Genetics.

[41]  Jesse S. Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the intersection of a regional wildlife connectivity network with highways , 2013, Movement ecology.

[42]  S. Kalinowski hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness , 2005 .

[43]  Peter Beerli,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  P. Turner,et al.  Pine marten (Martes martes) distribution and abundance in Ireland: A cross-jurisdictional analysis using non-invasive genetic survey techniques , 2012 .

[45]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Genetic structure of European pine martens (Martes martes), and evidence for introgression with M. americana in England , 2003, Conservation Genetics.

[46]  S. Brainerd,et al.  Habitat selection by Eurasian pine martens Martes martes in managed forests of southern boreal Scandinavia , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[47]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spatially-explicit estimation of Wright's neighborhood size in continuous populations , 2014, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[48]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Landscape connectivity analysis for conservation: insights from combining new methods with ecological and genetic data , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  Sampling affects the detection of genetic subdivision and conservation implications for fisher in the Sierra Nevada , 2014, Conservation Genetics.

[50]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION EFFECTS , 2002 .

[51]  P. J. Lozano,et al.  Assessing Highway Permeability for the Restoration of Landscape Connectivity between Protected Areas in the Basque Country, Northern Spain , 2010 .

[52]  S. Cushman,et al.  sGD: software for estimating spatially explicit indices of genetic diversity , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[53]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[54]  L. Waits,et al.  Contributions of landscape genetics – approaches, insights, and future potential , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[55]  Genetic diversity and drivers of genetic differentiation of Reaumuria soongorica of the Inner Mongolia plateau in China , 2015, Plant Ecology.

[56]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[57]  T. Roper,et al.  Socio-spatial organization of urban stone martens , 2009 .

[58]  W. Jędrzejewski,et al.  Spatial organisation and dynamics of the pine marten Martes martes population in Białowieza Forest (E Poland) compared with other European woodlands , 2006 .

[59]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics , 2005 .

[60]  Peter Beerli,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters , 2006, Bioinform..

[61]  AURÉLIE COULON,et al.  Statistical methods in spatial genetics , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[62]  M. Stephens,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. , 2003, Genetics.

[63]  Interplay between isolation by distance and genetic clusters in the red coral Corallium rubrum: insights from simulated and empirical data , 2013, Conservation Genetics.

[64]  S. Manel,et al.  Temporal and spatial analyses disclose consequences of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[65]  G. Luikart,et al.  BOTTLENECK : A Computer Program for Detecting Recent Reductions in the Effective Population Size Using Allele Frequency Data , 2017 .

[66]  M. Stephens,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.

[67]  J. Gerard,et al.  Movement patterns, habitat selection, and corridor use of a typical woodland-dweller species, the European pine marten (Martes martes), in fragmented landscape , 2008 .

[68]  G. Luikart,et al.  Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[69]  E. Thompson,et al.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. , 1992, Biometrics.

[70]  J. Goudet FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995) , 2001 .

[71]  Laura Finnegan,et al.  Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[72]  S. Cushman,et al.  Landscape Genetics for the Empirical Assessment of Resistance Surfaces: The European Pine Marten (Martes martes) as a Target-Species of a Regional Ecological Network , 2014, PloS one.

[73]  J. Goudet FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics , 1995 .

[74]  S. Cushman,et al.  Effects of climatic gradients on genetic differentiation of Caragana on the Ordos Plateau, China , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[75]  S. Aron,et al.  At the brink of supercoloniality: genetic, behavioral, and chemical assessments of population structure of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger , 2014, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[76]  J. Goszczyński,et al.  Patterns of winter locomotion and foraging in two sympatric marten species: Martes martes and Martes foina , 2007 .

[77]  A. Nikula,et al.  Abundances of red fox and pine marten in relation to the composition of boreal forest landscapes. , 1998, The Journal of animal ecology.

[78]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis , 2005, Evolutionary bioinformatics online.

[79]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[80]  M. Fortin,et al.  Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape‐genetic studies of gene flow , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[81]  S. Cushman,et al.  Landscape genetic connectivity in a riparian foundation tree is jointly driven by climatic gradients and river networks. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[82]  Daniel G. Scognamillo,et al.  Deciphering ecological barriers to North American river otter (Lontra canadensis) gene flow in the Louisiana landscape. , 2008, The Journal of heredity.

[83]  M. White,et al.  Predicting Landscape-Genetic Consequences of Habitat Loss, Fragmentation and Mobility for Multiple Species of Woodland Birds , 2012, PloS one.

[84]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Linking movement behavior and fine-scale genetic structure to model landscape connectivity for bobcats (Lynx rufus) , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[85]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[86]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[87]  A. Ruiz-González,et al.  A non-invasive genetic method to identify the sympatric mustelids pine marten (Martes martes) and stone marten (Martes foina): preliminary distribution survey on the northern Iberian Peninsula , 2008, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[88]  M. Bruford,et al.  Bayesian clustering techniques and progressive partitioning to identify population structuring within a recovering otter population in the UK , 2011 .

[89]  Nicolas Ray,et al.  Rise of oceanographic barriers in continuous populations of a cetacean: the genetic structure of harbour porpoises in Old World waters , 2007, BMC Biology.

[90]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[91]  F. Wei,et al.  The effect of landscape features on population genetic structure in Yunnan snub‐nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) implies an anthropogenic genetic discontinuity , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[92]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[93]  M. Flamand,et al.  Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa) , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[94]  G. Evanno,et al.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[95]  S. Cushman,et al.  Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics , 2013 .

[96]  C. Prigioni,et al.  Distribution and habitat use by pine marten Martes martes in a riparian corridor crossing intensively cultivated lowlands , 2014, Ecological Research.

[97]  J M Cornuet,et al.  Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. , 1996, Genetics.

[98]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation in resource selection: insights from the American marten (Martes americana). , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[99]  M. Strien,et al.  Isolation-by-distance in landscapes: considerations for landscape genetics , 2014, Heredity.

[100]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of landscape genetic data , 2013, Conservation Genetics.

[101]  J. Roeder,et al.  Effect of forest fragmentation on space-use patterns in the European pine marten (Martes martes) , 2011 .

[102]  Jan Zima,et al.  The Atlas of European Mammals , 1999 .

[103]  Noah A. Rosenberg,et al.  CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure , 2007, Bioinform..