Keeping things simple: why the Human Development Index should not diverge from its equal weights assumption

Using a range of statistical criteria rooted in Information Theory we show that there is little justification for relaxing the equal weights assumption underlying the United Nation’s Human Development Index (HDI) even if the true HDI diverges significantly from this assumption. Put differently, the additional model complexity that unequal weights add to the HDI more than counteracts the improvement in goodness-of-fit. This suggests that, in some cases, there may be limited validity in increasing the complexity of a range of other composite sustainability indices.

[1]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index , 2006 .

[2]  Lisa Segnestam.  Indicators of Environment and Sustainable Development , 2002 .

[3]  Philip Andrew Lawn,et al.  Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale? Finding out with the aid of `benefit' and `cost' accounts and a sustainable net benefit index , 1999 .

[4]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[5]  I. J. Myung,et al.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[6]  J. Rissanen.  Stochastic complexity and the mdl principle , 1987 .

[7]  H. West,et al.  Parsimonious modelling of nutrient fluxes for a terrestrial ecosystem on Svalbard , 2006 .

[8]  T. N. Srinivasan,et al.  Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel? , 1994 .

[9]  Mohan Munasinghe,et al.  Measuring sustainable development , 1997 .

[10]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[11]  A. Sagar,et al.  Shaping human development: Which way next? , 1999 .

[12]  P. Bartelmus.  Environment and Development , 1986 .

[13]  Peter Hardi,et al.  Assessing sustainable development : principles in practice , 1997 .

[14]  Philip A. Lawn.  Sustainable development indicators in ecological economics , 2006 .

[15]  J. Church.  Human Development Report , 2001 .

[16]  Stephen Morse,et al.  For better or for worse, till the human development index do us part? , 2003 .

[17]  Claudia Gallikowski.  Agenda 21 , 1999 .

[18]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[19]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[20]  Lisa Segnestam.  Indicators of Environment and Sustainable Development Theories and Practical Experience , 2003 .

[21]  H. Bossel.  Indicators for sustainable Development : theory, method, applications : a report to the Balaton Group , 1999 .

[22]  G. H. Brundtland.  World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[23]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The ISEW -- not an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare , 1999 .

[24]  H. Bozdogan.  On the information-based measure of covariance complexity and its application to the evaluation of multivariate linear models , 1990 .

[25]  J. Last.  Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[26]  E. Weiss.  United Nations Conference on Environment and Development , 1992, International Legal Materials.

[27]  C. Sneddon.  ‘Sustainability’ in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: a review , 2000 .

[28]  F. Booysen.  An Overview and Evaluation of Composite Indices of Development , 2002 .

[29]  N. A. Glenn,et al.  A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture , 2000 .

[30]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[31]  T. Healy,et al.  The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Education and Skills. , 2001 .

[32]  Christopher J L Murray,et al.  Development data constraints and the human development index , 1994 .

[33]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .