A computational theory of enterprise transformation

This paper translates a qualitative theory of enterprise transformation into a quantitative, mathematical theory. This enables computational exploration of the phenomena outlined in the theory, as well as the sensitivity of these phenomena to a range of parameters intended to reflect the elements of the theory. The overall question addressed is, “What should an enterprise do in response to perceptions of impending substantial change?” A mixture of three types of responses is considered—predict better, learn faster, and act faster. As these responses all require investments, it is not the case that an enterprise should always pursue all of them. Indeed, there are conditions under which an enterprise should not pursue any of them. This paper elaborates the nature of these conditions, explains why they arise, and discusses the implications for enterprises entertaining transformation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  J Moncrieff.  Is strategy making a difference , 1999 .

[2]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Enterprise Transformation: Understanding and Enabling Fundamental Change (Wiley Series in Systems Engineering and Management) , 2006 .

[3]  William B. Rouse,et al.  A theory of enterprise transformation , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[5]  Louis V. Gerstner,et al.  Who Says Elephants Can't Dance?: Inside IBM's Historic Turnaround , 2002 .

[6]  W. Rouse.  Start Where You Are: Matching Your Strategy to Your Marketplace , 1996 .

[7]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Enterprise transformation , 2006, CACM.

[8]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Simultaneous Equation Model of Corporate Strategy , 1978 .

[9]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Car wars: Factors underlying the success or failure of new car programs , 2010, Syst. Eng..

[10]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[11]  William B. Rouse,et al.  People and Organizations: Explorations of Human-Centered Design , 2007 .

[12]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[13]  K. Worsley.  Testing for a Two-Phase Multiple Regression , 1983 .

[14]  W. Rouse.  Enterprise Transformation: Understanding and Enabling Fundamental Change , 2006 .

[15]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[16]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[17]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Necessary Competencies for Transforming an Enterprise , 2011 .

[18]  C. Markides.  A Dynamic View of Strategy , 1999 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[20]  T. Amburgey,et al.  Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model Of Strategic Change , 1991 .

[21]  William B. Rouse.  Catalysts for Change: Concepts and Principles for Enabling Innovation , 1993 .

[22]  Louis V. Jr. Gerstner,et al.  WHO SAYS ELEPHANTS CAN'T DANCE? , 2002 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[24]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Understanding Complex Product and Service Delivery Systems , 2010 .

[25]  R. Hallion.  Taking Flight , 2003 .

[26]  William B. Rouse,et al.  People and Organizations , 2007 .