An evaluation of EMBASE within the NHS: findings of the Database Access Project working partnership to extend the knowledge base of healthcare.

An earlier article in the Innovations on the Internet Series introduced the Database Access Project (DAPs) at Southmead Health Services NHS Trust, which piloted the introduction and use of EMBASE via the Internet and NHSnet. This follow-up article assesses the results of the Project, and reports on its findings. In particular, it considers the usefulness of EMBASE in terms of coverage and content for different groups of NHS users and aspects of take-up in terms of access arrangements and patterns of usage. It also considers the likely impact on the library and information service in terms of providing training and user support and meeting related demands, for example the acquisition of full-text articles as a result of increased levels of searching. The value of retaining access to EMBASE was recognized by the majority of those who participated in the Project, despite its acknowledged overlap with other databases. The coverage of the database was identified as being relevant by a majority of users; both its expanded European coverage and its coverage of drug-related and mental health literature were identified as important aspects. The project identified a clear preference for remote access to the database, although there was still a need to visit the library for retrieval of full text. Lack of time both for training and for actual database use, and lack of confidence in applying search skills and in appraising research were identified as key challenges to database searching. The authors highlight the special role of information professionals in providing training and support for NHS professionals in the acquisition of search skills and critical appraisal skills in order to encourage effective database use.

[1]  S. Edinger,et al.  Databases--their use in developing clinical practice guidelines and estimating the cost impact of guideline implementation. , 1996, Journal of AHIMA.

[2]  Ravid J. Sodha Trends in biomedical publications: US and Japanese authors in US journals and European journals , 1993, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  D. Sackett Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 2018 .

[4]  J A Gray Where's the chief knowledge officer? , 1998, BMJ.

[5]  Athanase B. Kanamugire,et al.  RESPONDING TO RESEARCHERS' AND FACULTY USE PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF CDROM SERVICES , 1996 .

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Transferring evidence from research into practice: 2. Getting the evidence straight , 1997, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[7]  Angela Gunn EMBASE OR MEDLINE? The impact of the BIDS EMBASE service on academic medical libraries and their users. Meeting organized by the University Medical School Librarians Group, Leicester University Library, 20 January 1993. , 1993 .

[8]  Cecelia M. Brown The Benefits of Searching EMBASE versus MEDLINE for pharmaceutical Information , 1998, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  A. Detsky,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. , 1992, JAMA.

[10]  D. Roberts Index Medicus and Medline for Occupational Therapists. Part 1: An Overview of Coverage and Searching Methods , 1990 .

[11]  C. A. Moser,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation , 1958 .

[12]  B. Sarrut,et al.  Evaluation of Drug Interaction Document Citation in Nine On-Line Bibliographic Databases , 1997, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[13]  O. Biarez,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Nine Bibliographic Databases concerning Adverse Drug Reactions , 1991, DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy.