Students' approaches to the evaluation of digital information: Insights from their trust judgments

© 2015 British Educational Research Association. This study contributes to an understanding of the role of experience in the evaluation phase of the information search process. A questionnaire-based survey collected data from 1st and 3rd-year undergraduate students regarding the factors that influence their judgment of the trustworthiness of online health information. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. First-year students identified four factors: ease of use, content, recommendation and brand. Third-year students identified seven factors, in order of importance: content, credibility, recommendation, ease of use, usefulness, style and brand. They also were much clearer about their evaluation processes than 1st-year students; for 3rd-year students, the factor structure was clearer, and items generally loaded onto the expected factors. The significance of these findings is discussed and recommendations for practice and further research are offered.

[1]  D. Smith,et al.  Health care consumer's use and trust of health information sources , 2011 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  PATTERNS OF INFORMATION SEEKING ON THE WEB: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DOMAIN EXPERTISE AND WEB EXPERTISE , 2003 .

[4]  Lindsay Fullerton,et al.  Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content , 2010 .

[5]  D. R. Danielson,et al.  How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants , 2003, DUX '03.

[6]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Trust in digital information , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Methods for evaluating information sources: An annotated catalogue , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  YOUNG ADULTS' CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF WIKIPEDIA , 2011 .

[9]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement , 1998, MIS Q..

[10]  Elizabeth Sillence,et al.  Going online for health advice: Changes in usage and trust practices over the last five years , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Gillian Fergie,et al.  What young people want from health-related online resources: a focus group study , 2012, Journal of youth studies.

[12]  Brent Auernheimer,et al.  Web site credibility: Why do people believe what they believe? , 2009 .

[13]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Perceived Threat and Corroboration: Key Factors That Improve a Predictive Model of Trust in Internet-based Health Information and Advice , 2011, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[14]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[15]  Jonathan A. Plucker,et al.  Why Can't I Find Newton's Third Law? Case Studies of Students' Use of the Web as a Science Resource , 2002 .

[16]  Aybüke Aurum,et al.  A taxonomy for measuring the success of open source software projects , 2011, First Monday.

[17]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  What leads students to adopt information from Wikipedia? An empirical investigation into the role of trust and information usefulness , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Information quality assessment of community generated content: A user study of Wikipedia , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[21]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Factors influencing online health information search: An empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  J. Klein,et al.  Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[23]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[26]  Julie F. Pallant,et al.  SPSS Survival Manual , 2020 .

[27]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[29]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Research Paper: Consumer Health Information Seeking as Hypothesis Testing , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Sook Lim,et al.  Credibility judgment and verification behavior of college students concerning Wikipedia , 2011, First Monday.

[31]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[32]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Teaching Students to Evaluate Source Reliability during Internet Research Tasks , 2006, ICLS.

[33]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Jan Maarten Schraagen,et al.  Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Inquiring Minds Acquiring Wellness: Uses of Online and Offline Sources for Health Information , 2012, Health communication.

[37]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Adolescents Searching for Health Information on the Internet: An Observational Study , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[38]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior , 2009, WSDM '09.

[41]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[42]  M. Bartlett,et al.  A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations , 1954 .

[43]  Afzaal H. Seyal,et al.  Determinants of academic use of the Internet: A structural equation model , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  Mary Stansbury,et al.  Consumer health information on the Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of credibility , 2010 .

[46]  Matthijs L. Noordzij,et al.  Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[48]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  M. Fain.  Assessing Information Literacy Skills Development in First Year Students: A Multi-Year Study , 2011 .

[50]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change , 2011 .

[51]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Health Information-Seeking in the Digital Age , 2011, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.