Crossing the Pillars of Hercules: The Role of Spatial Frames of Reference in Error Making

This paper introduces a perspective accounting for errors that may occur as a result of the human interaction with the three-dimensional (3D) space. Particularly, we are interested in errors that are caused by cognitively crossing the boundary between peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Several behavioural, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological perspectives are reviewed in order to develop the theoretical framework on which our ideas are founded. We argue that cognitively crossing the boundary implies switching from one frame of reference to another, which, as a consequence, implies specific costs. The results of five experiments (overall involving 76 participants) support our hypothesis, suggesting the existence of different action-oriented spatial frames of reference.

[1]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  F. Previc.  The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[5]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design , 1994 .

[6]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Multimodal Structure of the Extrapersonal Space , 1983 .

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Ma Conway,et al.  Handbook of perception and cognition , 1996 .

[9]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.

[10]  W. Prinz,et al.  The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[12]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  The Influence of Center of Mass Effect on the Distribution of Spatial Attention in the Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits for Spatial Attention and Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations , 2002 .

[16]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  A. Cowey,et al.  No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Y. Coello,et al.  Retinal and extra-retinal contribution to position coding , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  G. Kerkhoff.  Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  M. Jeannerod.  Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal cortex: from sight to action , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  A. Wohlschläger.  Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[25]  J. Brožek.  Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .

[26]  J. Duncan.  Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  M A Arbib,et al.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[28]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[29]  Pierluigi Zoccolotti,et al.  Influence of the radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[31]  Stefano Cappa,et al.  Visual Neglect for Far and Near Extra-Personal Space in Humans , 1989, Cortex.

[32]  K. Fernow.  New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[33]  Yann Coello,et al.  The Contribution of Retinal Signal to the Specification of Target Distance in a Visuo-manual Task. , 2000 .

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[35]  A. Cohen,et al.  Action-based and vision-based selection of input: Two sources of control , 2002, Psychological research.

[36]  Steven M. Finbeiner,et al.  The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements , 1989, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[37]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  G. Ishimura.  Visuomotor factors for action capture , 1995 .

[39]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Spatial Cognition: Where We Were and Where We Are , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  F. Ferlazzo,et al.  Functional Representation of 3d Space in Endogenous Attention Shifts , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Visuomotor neurons: ambiguity of the discharge or 'motor' perception? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[44]  A. Pouget,et al.  Relating unilateral neglect to the neural coding of space , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Reference points in spatial cognition. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[46]  T Landis,et al.  So near yet so far: Neglect in far or near space depends on tool use , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[47]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[48]  M. Jeannerod.  The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[49]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? , 1993, Cognition.