Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Pitch discrimination interference (PDI) refers to an impairment in the ability to discriminate changes in the fundamental frequency (F0) of a target harmonic complex, caused by another harmonic complex (the interferer) presented simultaneously in a remote spectral region. So far, PDI has been demonstrated for target complexes filtered into a higher spectral region than the interferer and containing no peripherally resolved harmonics in their passband. Here, it is shown that PDI also occurs when the target harmonic complex contains resolved harmonics in its passband (experiment 1). PDI was also observed when the target was filtered into a lower spectral region than that of the interferer (experiment 2), revealing that differences in relative harmonic dominance and pitch salience between the simultaneous target and the interferer, as confirmed using pitch matches (experiment 3), do not entirely explain PDI. When the target was in the higher spectral region, and the F0 separation between the target and the interferer was around 7% or 10%, dramatic PDI effects were observed despite the relatively large FO separation between the two sequential targets (14%-20%). Overall, the results suggest that PDI is more general than previously thought, and is not limited to targets consisting only of unresolved harmonics.

[1]  B. Moore,et al.  Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Emily Buss,et al.  Virtual pitch integration for asynchronous harmonics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of pitch pulse asynchrony. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al.  Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .

[7]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  The ear as a frequency analyzer. II. , 1964, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Context dependence of fundamental-frequency discrimination: lateralized temporal fringes. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  H. Dai.  On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Effects of temporal fringes on fundamental-frequency discrimination. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Pitch identification of simultaneous diotic and dichotic two-tone complexes. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Licklider,et al.  A duplex theory of pitch perception , 1951, Experientia.

[14]  R. Carlyon.  Encoding the fundamental frequency of a complex tone in the presence of a spectrally overlapping masker. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of Envelope-Vocoder Processing on F0 Discrimination and Concurrent-Vowel Identification , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Q Summerfield,et al.  The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Carlyon,et al.  The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C J Darwin,et al.  Simultaneous grouping and auditory continuity , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  L. Demany,et al.  Pitch perception: a difference between right- and left-handed listeners , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R Meddis,et al.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  M. Scherg,et al.  Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Ritsma.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones , 1985 .

[25]  G. Smoorenburg.  Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .

[27]  C. Darwin,et al.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C. Darwin,et al.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  C J Darwin,et al.  Limits to the role of a common fundamental frequency in the fusion of two sounds with different spatial cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Multiple period estimation and pitch perception model , 1999, Speech Commun..

[31]  R. Plomp.  Pitch of complex tones. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J. Culling,et al.  Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Dominance region for pitch: effects of duration and dichotic presentation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  J. L. Goldstein.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.