Three-dimensional orientation and location-dependent varying rules of radiographic angles of the acetabular cup

AimThe aim of this study is to demonstrate the varying rules of radiographic angles following varying three-dimensional (3D) orientations and locations of cup using an accurate mathematical model.MethodsA cone model is established to address the quantitative relationship between the opening circle of cup and its ellipse projection on radiograph. The varying rules of two-dimensional (2D) radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI) angles can be analyzed.ResultsWhen the centre of cup is located above X-ray source, with proper 3D RI/RA angles, 2D RA angle can be equal to its 3D counterpart, and 2D RI angle is usually greater than its 3D counterpart. Except for the original point on hip-centered anterior-posterior radiograph, there is no area on radiograph where both 2D RA and RI angles are equal to their 3D counterparts simultaneously.DiscussionThis study proposes an innovative model for accurately explaining how 2D RA/RI angles of cup are varying following different 3D RA/RI angles and location of cup. The analysis results provide clinicians an intuitive grasp of knowledge about 2D RA/RI angles greater or smaller than their 3D counterparts post-operatively. The established model may allow determining the effects of pelvic rotations on 2D radiographic angles of cup.

[1]  Lars Perlick,et al.  Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Mark H. Gonzalez,et al.  Validating a Modified Circle Theorem Method for the Measurement of Acetabular Cup Anteversion on Plain Radiography with Intra-Operative Data from Robotic Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching , 2005, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[4]  Chris R Mellano,et al.  How does pelvic rotation or tilt affect radiographic measurement of acetabular component inclination angle during THA? , 2015, Journal of orthopaedics.

[5]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  R. Pradhan,et al.  Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Joachim Grifka,et al.  Correction of Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Rotation in Cup Measurement after THA – An Experimental Study , 2017, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[8]  Zhe Zhao,et al.  A mathematical method for precisely calculating the radiographic angles of the cup after total hip arthroplasty. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  P. Foguet,et al.  Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography , 2013, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[10]  Carolyn Anglin,et al.  A multiplanar radiography method for assessing cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Chiou-Shann Fuh,et al.  Measurement of the acetabular cup anteversion on simulated radiographs. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Radiographic cup anteversion measurement corrected from pelvic tilt. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  A validation model for measurement of acetabular component position. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Karl-Heinz Widmer,et al.  A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  M. Stover,et al.  Quantitative Effect of Pelvic Position on Radiographic Assessment of Acetabular Component Position. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  Stephen J. McKenna,et al.  Automated assessment of polyethylene wear in cemented acetabular components using anteroposterior radiographs of total hip replacements , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[18]  Brian Derbyshire,et al.  Correction of acetabular cup orientation measurements for X-ray beam offset. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Imaging and Navigation Measurement of Acetabular Component Position in THA , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  D Resnick,et al.  Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring. , 1975, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  Abtin Alvand,et al.  Surgeons' Accuracy in Achieving Their Desired Acetabular Component Orientation. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  Brian Derbyshire A mathematical method for precisely calculating the radiographic angles of the cup after total hip arthroplasty. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  T. Schwarz,et al.  Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.