Classification of brain tumors using PCA-ANN

The present study is conducted to assist radiologists in marking tumor boundaries and in decision making process for multiclass classification of brain tumors. Primary brain tumors and secondary brain tumors along with normal regions are segmented by Gradient Vector Flow (GVF)-a boundary based technique. GVF is a user interactive model for extracting tumor boundaries. These segmented regions of interest (ROIs) are than classified by using Principal Component Analysis-Artificial Neural Network (PCA-ANN) approach. The study is performed on diversified dataset of 856 ROIs from 428 post contrast T1- weighted MR images of 55 patients. 218 texture and intensity features are extracted from ROIs. PCA is used for reduction of dimensionality of the feature space. Six classes which include primary tumors such as Astrocytoma (AS), Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), child tumor-Medulloblastoma (MED) and Meningioma (MEN), secondary tumor-Metastatic (MET) along with normal regions (NR) are discriminated using ANN. Test results show that the PCA-ANN approach has enhanced the overall accuracy of ANN from 72.97 % to 95.37%. The proposed method has delivered a high accuracy for each class: AS-90.74%, GBM-88.46%, MED-85.00%, MEN-90.70%, MET-96.67%and NR-93.78%. It is observed that PCA-ANN provides better results than the existing methods.

[1]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Invariant texture segmentation via circular Gabor filters , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[2]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Marc Acheroy,et al.  Texture classification using Gabor filters , 2002, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem,et al.  Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification , 2010, Digit. Signal Process..

[8]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[9]  D. Selvathi,et al.  Brain MRI Slices Classification Using Least Squares Support Vector Machine , 2007 .

[10]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[11]  Irene Cheng,et al.  Fluid Vector Flow and Applications in Brain Tumor Segmentation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  K. R. Rao,et al.  Orthogonal Transforms for Digital Signal Processing , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  George C. Kagadis,et al.  Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural features , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[16]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[17]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  George C. Kagadis,et al.  Non-linear Least Squares Features Transformation for Improving the Performance of Probabilistic Neural Networks in Classifying Human Brain Tumors on MRI , 2007, ICCSA.

[19]  Jean-Marc Constans,et al.  A framework of fuzzy information fusion for the segmentation of brain tumor tissues on MR images , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[20]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.