Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor

Purpose This study aimed to implement an aggregation method in Matlab for generating ActiGraph counts from raw acceleration recorded with an alternative accelerometer device and to investigate the validity of the method. Methods The aggregation method, including the frequency band-pass filter, was implemented and optimized based on standardized sinusoidal acceleration signals generated in Matlab and processed in the ActiLife software. Evaluating the validity of the aggregation method was approached using a mechanical setup and with a 24-h free-living recording using a convenient sample of nine subjects. Counts generated with the aggregation method applied to Axivity AX3 raw acceleration data were compared with counts generated with ActiLife from ActiGraph GT3X+ data. Results An optimal band-pass filter was fitted resulting in a root-mean-square error of 25.7 counts per 10 s and mean absolute error of 15.0 counts per second across the full frequency range. The mechanical evaluation of the proposed aggregation method resulted in an absolute mean ± SD difference of −0.11 ± 0.97 counts per 10 s across all rotational frequencies compared with the original ActiGraph method. Applying the aggregation method to the 24-h free-living recordings resulted in an epoch level bias ranging from −16.2 to 0.9 counts per 10 s, a relative difference in the averaged physical activity (counts per minute) ranging from −0.5% to 4.7% with a group mean ± SD of 2.2% ± 1.7%, and a Cohen’s kappa of 0.945, indicating almost a perfect agreement in the intensity classification. Conclusion The proposed band-pass filter and aggregation method is highly valid for generating ActiGraph counts from raw acceleration data recorded with alternative devices. It would facilitate comparability between studies using different devices collecting raw acceleration data.

[1]  T. Chai,et al.  Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature , 2014 .

[2]  Relationship Between the MTI Accelerometer (Actigraph) Counts and Running Speed During Continuous and Intermittent Exercise. , 2005, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[3]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  Daniel Arvidsson,et al.  Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts. , 2016, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Dinesh John,et al.  ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Dinesh John,et al.  Biomechanical examination of the ‘plateau phenomenon’ in ActiGraph vertical activity counts , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Robert Williams,et al.  Fully proportional actigraphy: A new instrument , 1996 .

[9]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Scott Duncan,et al.  Accelerometer data reduction in adolescents: effects on sample retention and bias , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[11]  Søren Brage,et al.  A method to compare new and traditional accelerometry data in physical activity monitoring , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM).

[12]  Joss Langford,et al.  Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents , 2014, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study) , 2006, The Lancet.

[14]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[15]  D Peach,et al.  Exploring the ActiLife® filtration algorithm: converting raw acceleration data to counts , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Patty S. Freedson,et al.  Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors , 2013, Sensors.

[17]  Duncan J Macfarlane,et al.  Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[18]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Karsten Froberg,et al.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  S. Brage,et al.  Intergeneration accelerometer differences and correction for on-board frequency-based filtering. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults , 2010, Sports medicine.

[22]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[23]  Lars Bo Andersen,et al.  Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[24]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[25]  D. Baer,et al.  Comparison of two different physical activity monitors , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[26]  T. Vasankari,et al.  A universal, accurate intensity‐based classification of different physical activities using raw data of accelerometer , 2015, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[27]  L. Straker,et al.  Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[28]  Richard G. Lyons,et al.  Understanding Digital Signal Processing , 1996 .

[29]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.