Purpose – Corporations and their leaders are coming under increasing pressure to achieve “sustainability.” Sustainable enterprises minimize harmful environmental impacts, are socially responsible, and create shareholder value.Design/methodology/approach – Using secondary data, we compared the financial performance of recognized sustainability leaders to that of a carefully selected matched set of competitors.Findings – The authors find that, on average, sustainability leaders outperform their competitors. However, this is true and only two out of three cases.Research limitations/implications – While the authors utilized a relatively small sample with data that covers only a three‐year period, the use of secondary data from two different databases reduces concerns about common method bias. The clear implication of this analysis is that a commitment to sustainability does not harm financial performance and may, in fact, enhance performance.Practical implications – The authors conclude with a set of recommen...
[1]
R. Freeman.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions
,
1994,
Business Ethics Quarterly.
[2]
Marc Gunther.
The end of garbage.
,
2007,
Fortune.
[3]
Daniel C. Esty,et al.
Green to Gold
,
2006
.
[4]
Thomas Y. Choi,et al.
Building deep supplier relationships
,
2004
.
[5]
M. Friedman,et al.
Capitalism and Freedom
,
1963
.
[6]
Andrew Savitz,et al.
The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success -- and How You Can Too
,
2006
.
[7]
H. V. D. Heijden.
World resources 2002-2004
,
2005
.
[8]
N. Smith,et al.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?
,
2003
.