Relax! Cognitive strategy influences visual search

Two experiments evaluated whether visual search can be made more efficient by having participants give up active control over the guidance of attention. In Experiment 1 participants were instructed to search while either actively directing their attention to the target or by passively allowing the target to just “pop” into their minds. Results showed that passive instructions led to more efficient search on a hard task but not on an easy task. In Experiment 2 participants completed the search task either by itself or concurrently with a memory task. This yielded the same pattern of results as Experiment 1; a hard search was completed more efficiently when performed concurrently with a memory task than when performed alone. These findings suggest (a) that the efficiency of some difficult searches can be improved by instructing participants to relax and adopt a passive cognitive strategy and (b) the improved efficiency results from a reduced reliance on slow executive control processes and a greater reliance on rapid automatic processes for directing visual attention.

[1]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Lee R. Brooks,et al.  After the learning is over: factors controlling the selective application of general and particular knowledge , 1994 .

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  Absolute Inhibition Is Incompatible with Conscious Perception , 1993, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[7]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  James T. Enns,et al.  Target detection and localization in visual search: A dual systems perspective , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. Enns,et al.  LIFESPAN CHANGES IN ATTENTION: THE VISUAL SEARCH TASK , 1998 .

[12]  J T Enns,et al.  The development of selective attention: a life-span overview. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[17]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Perception below the Objective Threshold? , 1993, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Enns,et al.  The illusion of clarity: Image segmentation and edge attribution without filling-in , 2006 .

[21]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[22]  Augustinus H. J. Oomes,et al.  Erratum to: The beholder’s share in the perception of orientation of 2-D shapes. , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A. Lleras,et al.  Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[24]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[26]  L. Brooks,et al.  Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept Learning , 1984 .

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  H. Shevrin,et al.  The Mediation of Intentional Judgments by Unconscious Perceptions: The Influences of Task Strategy, Task Preference, Word Meaning, and Motivation , 1993, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  S Baron-Cohen,et al.  Superior visual search in autism. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2003 .

[32]  L. Lange.  Neue Experimente uber den Vorgang der einfachen Reaction auf Sinneseindrucke , 1888 .

[33]  Robert S. Lockhart,et al.  Learning and Motivation , 1981 .

[34]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[35]  D. Smilek,et al.  Revisiting the category effect: The influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search , 2006, Brain Research.

[36]  Takatsune Kumada,et al.  Early selection induced by perceptual load in a patient with frontal lobe damage: External vs. internal modulation of processing control , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The Beneficial Effect of Concurrent Task-Irrelevant Mental Activity on Temporal Attention , 2005, Psychological science.