Geometrically Proper Models in Statistical Training

In deformable model segmentation, the geometric training process plays a crucial role in providing shape statistical priors and appearance statistics that are used as likelihoods. Also, the geometric training process plays a crucial role in providing shape probability distributions in methods finding significant differences between classes. The quality of the training seriously affects the final results of segmentation or of significant difference finding between classes. However, the lack of shape priors in the training stage itself makes it difficult to enforce shape legality, i.e., making the model free of local self-intersection or creases. Shape legality not only yields proper shape statistics but also increases the consistency of parameterization of the object volume and thus proper appearance statistics. In this paper we propose a method incorporating explicit legality constraints in training process. The method is mathematically sound and has proved in practice to lead to shape probability distributions over only proper objects and most importantly to better segmentation results.

[1]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[2]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  A statistical appearance model based on intensity quantile histograms , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[3]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Prostate Shape Modeling Based on Principal Geodesic Analysis Bootstrapping , 2004, MICCAI.

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Level Set Methods in an EM Framework for Shape Classification and Estimation , 2004, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[6]  Stephen M. Pizer,et al.  Interpolation in Discrete Single Figure Medial Objects , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[7]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Medial Representations: Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications , 2008 .

[8]  James N. Damon,et al.  Determining the Geometry of Boundaries of Objects from Medial Data , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable M-Reps for 3D Medical Image Segmentation , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  S. Pizer,et al.  Deformable solid modeling via medial sampling and displacement subdivision , 2004 .

[11]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  A STATISTICAL APPEARANCE MODEL BASED ON INTENSITY QUANTILES , 2005 .

[12]  J. Damon Smoothness and geometry of boundaries associated to skeletal structures, II: Geometry in the Blum case , 2004, Compositio Mathematica.

[13]  P. Danielsson Euclidean distance mapping , 1980 .

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modelling , 2001 .

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..