Ecological Momentary Assessment of Obesogenic Eating Behavior: Combining Person‐Specific and Environmental Predictors

Obesity has been promoted by a food environment that encourages excessive caloric intake. An understanding of how the food environment contributes to obesogenic eating behavior in different types of individuals may facilitate healthy weight control efforts. In this study, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) via palmtop computers was used to collect real‐time information about participants' environment and eating patterns to predict overeating (i.e., greater than usual intake during routine meals/snacks, and eating outside of a participant's normal routine) that could lead to weight gain. Thirty‐nine women (BMI = 21.6 ± 1.8; age = 20.1 ± 2.0 years; 61% white) of normal weight (BMI 18.5–25) completed the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and the Power of Food Scale (PFS), and carried a palmtop computer for 7–10 days, which prompted them to answer questions about eating events, including a count of the types of good tasting high‐calorie foods that were available. None of the self‐report measures predicted overeating, but BMI interacted with the number of palatable foods available to predict overeating (P = 0.035). Compared to leaner individuals who reported a relatively low frequency of overeating regardless of the availability of palatable food, the probability of overeating among heavier individuals was very low in the absence of palatable food, but quickly increased in proportion to the number of palatable foods available. Our findings suggest that the eating behavior of those with higher relative weights is susceptible to the presence of palatable foods in the environment. Individuals practicing weight control may benefit from limiting their exposure to good tasting high‐calorie food in their immediate environment.

[1]  N. Maccoby,et al.  The interview: a tool of social science , 1954 .

[2]  S. Schachter,et al.  Effects of fear, food deprivation, and obesity on eating. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  E. Rolls,et al.  Variety in a meal enhances food intake in man , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[5]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Self‐Recording of Everyday Life Events: Origins, Types, and Uses , 1991 .

[6]  R. Lappalainen,et al.  Reasons for Initiation and Cessation of Eating in Obese Men and Women and the Affective Consequences of Eating in Everyday Situations , 1998, Appetite.

[7]  R. Jeffery,et al.  Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. , 2001, Annual review of public health.

[8]  R. Carels,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment of temptation and lapse in dieting. , 2001, Eating behaviors.

[9]  D. Schoeller,et al.  Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities , 2004 .

[11]  B. Wansink Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. , 2004, Annual review of nutrition.

[12]  A. Levine,et al.  Eating motives and the controversy over dieting: eating less than needed versus less than wanted. , 2005, Obesity research.

[13]  N. Schwarz Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture , 2007 .

[14]  Corby K. Martin,et al.  Measurement of dietary restraint: Validity tests of four questionnaires , 2007, Appetite.

[15]  D. Schoeller,et al.  Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of moderate- to long-term dietary restriction? Objective biological and behavioral data suggest not. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[16]  J. Salmon,et al.  Associations Between the Home Food Environment and Obesity‐promoting Eating Behaviors in Adolescence , 2007, Obesity.

[17]  M. Butryn,et al.  Hedonic hunger: A new dimension of appetite? , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  E. Forman,et al.  A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: an analog study. , 2007, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  J. Smyth,et al.  Daily and momentary mood and stress are associated with binge eating and vomiting in bulimia nervosa patients in the natural environment. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  R. Wing,et al.  International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Home Grocery Delivery Improves the Household Food Environments of Behavioral Weight Loss Participants: Results of an 8-week Pilot Study , 2007 .

[21]  J. Blundell,et al.  Disinhibition: its effects on appetite and weight regulation , 2007, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[22]  A. Domingo-Salvany The science of real-time data capture: self-reports in health research , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[23]  J. Polivy,et al.  Internal and external moderators of the effect of variety on food intake. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  E. Ravussin,et al.  Estimating the changes in energy flux that characterize the rise in obesity prevalence. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[25]  J. Kounios,et al.  Asymmetric prefrontal cortex activation in relation to markers of overeating in obese humans , 2009, Appetite.

[26]  Christopher N. Ochner,et al.  The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment , 2009, Appetite.

[27]  R. Gerber,et al.  Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: development and measurement properties , 2009, International Journal of Obesity.

[28]  B. McCabe-Sellers,et al.  Advancing the art and science of dietary assessment through technology. , 2010, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.