Assessment of social functioning in depression.

Impairment of social functioning is a significant aspect of depression distinct from the symptoms of depression. Social functioning defines an individual's interactions with their environment and the ability to fulfill their role within such environments as work, social activities, and relationships with partners and family. The analysis of social functioning has arisen from a growing interest in measuring the consequences of depression and antidepressant therapy. Impairment often persists long after the resolution of symptoms by pharmacotherapy, and is not extensively assessed by the traditional scales to measure the intensity of depressive symptoms. Assessment is influenced by the method used, and there is an increased awareness that the patient's perspective should be foremost. Several scales for the evaluation of social functioning have already been developed, ranging from those requiring a structured interview with a trained assessor to self-assessment scales. In constructing such tools, a balance must be found between the amount of detail required to produce a clear account of the patient's social functioning and the ease of use in large multicenter studies. The newest scale is the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS), specifically for self-assessment of social functioning by patients with depression. It contains 21 items covering the different aspects of social interactions, global social attitude, and self-perception. The SASS has been validated and found to be simple to use and sensitive to changes in the different areas of social functioning. Recently, the SASS was used to demonstrate the greater efficacy of reboxetine, a new selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI), compared with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine, in improving social functioning in patients with depression. Specifically, the SASS was able to show that reboxetine improved patient motivation and self-perception. The SASS is another tool for the evaluation of the extent and quality of the response to treatment and may also help to elucidate the roles of noradrenaline and serotonin in depressive illness.

[1]  J. Massana Reboxetine versus fluoxetine: an overview of efficacy and tolerability. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[2]  J. Maas Biogenic amines and depression. Biochemical and pharmacological separation of two types of depression. , 1975, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  W. Holtzman Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. , 1951 .

[4]  J. Markowitz,et al.  Acute response of social functioning in dysthymic patients with desipramine. , 1995, Journal of affective disorders.

[5]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[6]  M M Weissman,et al.  The assessment of social adjustment. A review of techniques. , 1975, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  A. W. Clark The Personality and Social Network Adjustment Scale , 1968 .

[8]  D. Charney Monoamine dysfunction and the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[9]  D J Kupfer,et al.  Long-term treatment of depression. , 1991, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[10]  E. Paykel,et al.  Social maladjustment and severity of depression. , 1978, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[11]  J. Guilford Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[12]  A. Dubini,et al.  Development and validation of a social functioning scale, the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale , 1997, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[13]  M. Weissman Beyond symptoms: social functioning and the new antidepressants. , 1997, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[14]  R. Salomon,et al.  Monoamines and the mechanism of antidepressant action: effects of catecholamine depletion on mood of patients treated with antidepressants. , 1993, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[15]  G. Klerman,et al.  Treatment effects on the social adjustment of depressed patients. , 1974, Archives of general psychiatry.

[16]  J. Mendlewicz,et al.  Psychosocial predictors of major affective recurrences in bipolar disorder: a 4‐year longitudinal study of patients on prophylactic treatment , 1996, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[17]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The structured and scaled interview to assess maladjustment (SS1AM) , 1973 .

[18]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The Structured and Scaled Interview to Assess Maladjustment (SSIAM). I. Description, rationale, and development. , 1972, Archives of general psychiatry.

[20]  H. Möller,et al.  Reboxetine: a double-blind comparison with fluoxetine in major depressive disorder. , 1999, International clinical psychopharmacology.

[21]  Joseph Wolpe,et al.  Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders: by Aaron T. Beck International Universities Press. $15.00 , 1977 .

[22]  T. Hökfelt,et al.  Effect of antidepressant drugs on the depletion of intraneuronal brain 5-hydroxytryptamine stores caused by 4-methyl-alpha-ethyl-meta-tyramine. , 1969, European journal of pharmacology.

[23]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The Structured and Scaled Interview to Assess Maladjustment (SSIAM). II. Factor analysis, reliability, and validity. , 1972, Archives of general psychiatry.

[24]  A. Dubini,et al.  Noradrenaline-selective versus serotonin-selective antidepressant therapy: differential effects on social functioning. , 1997, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[25]  A. Dubini,et al.  Do noradrenaline and serotonin differentially affect social motivation and behaviour? , 1997, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[26]  R. Salomon,et al.  Clinical and biochemical effects of catecholamine depletion on antidepressant-induced remission of depression. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[27]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illnesses. , 1995, Archives of general psychiatry.

[28]  R. Salomon,et al.  Rapid serotonin depletion as a provocative challenge test for patients with major depression: relevance to antidepressant action and the neurobiology of depression. , 1991, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[29]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Imipramine and social-vocational adjustment in chronic depression. , 1988, The American journal of psychiatry.

[30]  G. Klerman,et al.  The enduring psychosocial consequences of mania and depression. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  D. Klein,et al.  Social adjustment in dysthymia, double depression and episodic major depression. , 1996, Journal of affective disorders.

[32]  M. Weissman,et al.  The depressed woman: A study of social relationships , 1974 .

[33]  M. Fava,et al.  Social adjustment does not predict depressive relapse during continuation fluoxetine therapy. , 1995, Journal of affective disorders.

[34]  D. Zerssen,et al.  Self-rating procdedures in the evaluation of antidepressants , 1995 .

[35]  S. Montgomery Reboxetine: additional benefits to the depressed patient. , 1997, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[36]  M. Weissman,et al.  Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. , 1976, Archives of general psychiatry.

[37]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .