Effect of Local Mupirocin Application on Exit-Site Infection and Peritonitis in an Indian Peritoneal Dialysis Population

Background Staphylococcus aureus-associated peritonitis and catheter exit-site infections (ESIs) are important causes of hospitalization and catheter loss in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Intranasal and topical use of mupirocin has been found to be an effective strategy in decreasing S. aureus-related infectious complications in persons who are carriers of S. aureus; however, there is no consensus regarding the prophylactic use of mupirocin irrespective of carrier status. We aimed to determine the potential effectiveness of application of mupirocin cream at the catheter exit site in preventing ESI and peritonitis irrespective of carrier status in a tropical country such as India. Methods This prospective historically controlled study was done in a total of 40 patients. From August 2003, all patients, incident and prevalent, were instructed to apply 2% mupirocin cream daily to the exit site instead of the older practice of povidone-iodine and gauze dressing. Patients were not screened to determine whether they were S. aureus carriers. The infection-related data for 1 year, until July 2004, were compared with the historical control, which was infection-related data for the year preceding the year of mupirocin application. Results Mean age of the study population was 62 years, with 61.8% being male and 64.3% being diabetic. Local application of mupirocin led to a significant reduction in the incidence density per patient-month of both ESI and peritonitis compared to controls (0.15 vs 0.37 and 0.37 vs 0.67, p = 0.01 for both). This amounted to a relative reduction of 60.5% and 55% respectively. ESI and peritonitis due to S. aureus were also significantly lower in the study group compared to controls (incidence density per patient-month 0.05 vs 0.13 and zero vs 0.17 respectively, p < 0.01 for both). There occurred no catheter removal due to infection-related complications during the study period compared to two during the control period. None of the patients reported a mupirocin-related adverse effect. Conclusions Daily application of mupirocin at the exit site is a well-tolerated and effective strategy in reducing the incidence of ESI and peritonitis in a tropical country such as India. It can thus significantly reduce morbidity, catheter loss, and transfer to hemodialysis in peritoneal dialysis patients.

[1]  Y. Carmeli,et al.  Mupirocin prophylaxis to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in patients undergoing dialysis: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  B. Piraino,et al.  Staphylococcus Aureus Prophylaxis and Trends in Gram-Negative Infections in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients , 2003, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[3]  J. Conly,et al.  Increasing Mupirocin Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus in CAPD — Should it Continue to be Used as Prophylaxis? , 2002, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[4]  M. Pérez-Fontán,et al.  Mupirocin resistance after long-term use for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[5]  J. Bargman,et al.  Emergence of Mupirocin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients using Mupirocin Prophylaxis to Prevent Exit-Site Infection , 2001, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[6]  A. Tzamaloukas,et al.  Effect of Preventing Staphylococcus Aureus Carriage on Rates of Peritoneal Catheter-Related Staphylococcal Infections. Literature Synthesis , 2001, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[7]  J. Burkart,et al.  Application of Mupirocin Cream at the Catheter Exit Site Reduces Exit-Site Infections and Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients , 2000, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[8]  B. Piraino,et al.  Adult Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis Treatment Recommendations: 2000 Update , 2000, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[9]  D G Oreopoulos,et al.  Decrease in Staphylococcus Aureus Exit-Site Infections and Peritonitis in Capd Patients by Local Application of Mupirocin Ointment at the Catheter Exit Site , 1998, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[10]  R. Gokal,et al.  Natural History of Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Carriage and its Relationship to Exit- Site Infection , 1998, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[11]  B. Piraino,et al.  Peritoneal Catheters and Exit-Site Practices toward Optimum Peritoneal Access: 1998 Update , 1998, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[12]  G. Prakash,et al.  'O' set connector system in CAPD. , 1996, The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India.

[13]  B. Piraino,et al.  A randomized trial of Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients: mupirocin calcium ointment 2% applied to the exit site versus cyclic oral rifampin. , 1996, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  M. Pérez-Fontán,et al.  Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with mupirocin: long-term results. , 1993, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[15]  S. Ash,et al.  Peritoneal Catheters and Exit -Site Practices: Toward Optimum Peritoneal Access , 1993, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[16]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Staphylococcus Aureus Peritoneal Catheter-Related Infections: A Cause of Catheter Loss and Peritonitis , 1988 .

[17]  L. Agodoa,et al.  United States Renal Data System (USRDS). , 2000, Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia.

[18]  P. Davey,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic nasal mupirocin in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis based on a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. , 1999, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[19]  M. Bending,et al.  Nasal mupirocin prevents Staphylococcus aureus exit-site infection during peritoneal dialysis. Mupirocin Study Group. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[20]  M. Pérez-Fontán,et al.  Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers in CAPD with mupirocin. , 1992, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.

[21]  I. Phillips,et al.  Active intervention dramatically reduces CAPD-associated infection. , 1991, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.

[22]  E. Chain,et al.  Pseudomonic acid. Part 1. The structure of pseudomonic acid A, a novel antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens. , 1977, Journal of the Chemical Society. Perkin transactions 1.