Array electrode design for transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a simulation study.

Array electrodes are a promising technology that is likely to bring transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) a step forward. The dynamic adaptation of electrode size and position helps to simplify the use of electrical stimulation systems and to increase their clinical efficacy. However, up to now array electrodes were built by trial and error and it is unclear how, for example, the gaps between the array elements or the resistivity of the electrode-skin interface material influence the current distribution. A TES model that comprises a finite element model and a nerve model has been used to analyze the influence of array electrode gaps and gel resistivities on nerve activation. Simulation results indicate that the resistivity of the electrode-skin interface layer should be adapted depending on the size of the gaps between the array elements. Furthermore, the gap sizes should be smaller than 3mm in order to keep losses small.

[1]  D. Lake.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation , 1992, Sports medicine.

[2]  Asif Usmani,et al.  7th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Antibes , 2006 .

[3]  D. Durand,et al.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Popovic,et al.  Multi-field surface electrode for selective electrical stimulation. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[6]  M. Morari,et al.  New Multi-Channel Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Technology for Rehabilitation , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  G. Lyons,et al.  An investigation of the effect of electrode size and electrode location on comfort during stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  L. Sheffler,et al.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation , 2007, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[10]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Dimiter Prodanov,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the fiber populations of the rat sciatic nerve, its spinal roots, and its major branches , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  Thierry Keller,et al.  A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Assessment of finger forces and wrist torques for functional grasp using new multichannel textile neuroprostheses. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[14]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Prediction of myelinated nerve fiber stimulation thresholds: limitations of linear models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Neuroprostheses for grasping , 2002, Neurological research.

[16]  G. Snoek,et al.  Use of the NESS Handmaster to restore handfunction in tetraplegia: clinical experiences in ten patients , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[17]  H. Gray.  Gray's Anatomy , 1858 .

[18]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[19]  Dominique M. Durand,et al.  Electrode Array for Reversing the Recruitment Order of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Experimental Studies , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Selective stimulation of sacral nerve roots for bladder control: A study by computer modeling , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.