Sequential beamforming for synthetic aperture imaging.

Synthetic aperture sequential beamforming (SASB) is a novel technique which allows to implement synthetic aperture beamforming on a system with a restricted complexity, and without storing RF-data. The objective is to improve lateral resolution and obtain a more depth independent resolution compared to conventional ultrasound imaging. SASB is a two-stage procedure using two separate beamformers. The initial step is to construct and store a set of B-mode image lines using a single focal point in both transmit and receive. The focal points are considered virtual sources and virtual receivers making up a virtual array. The second stage applies the focused image lines from the first stage as input data, and take advantage of the virtual array in the delay and sum beamforming. The size of the virtual array is dynamically expanded and the image is dynamically focused in both transmit and receive and a range independent lateral resolution is obtained. The SASB method has been investigated using simulations in Field II and by off-line processing of data acquired with a commercial scanner. The lateral resolution increases with a decreasing F#. Grating lobes appear if F#≤2 for a linear array with λ-pitch. The performance of SASB with the virtual source at 20mm and F#=1.5 is compared with conventional dynamic receive focusing (DRF). The axial resolution is the same for the two methods. For the lateral resolution there is improvement in FWHM of at least a factor of 2 and the improvement at -40dB is at least a factor of 3. With SASB the resolution is almost constant throughout the range. For DRF the FWHM increases almost linearly with range and the resolution at -40dB is fluctuating with range. The theoretical potential improvement in SNR of SASB over DRF has been estimated. An improvement is attained at the entire range, and at a depth of 80mm the improvement is 8dB.

[1]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  3D synthetic aperture imaging using a virtual source element in the elevation plane , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[2]  J. P. Ruina,et al.  Some Early Developments in Synthetic Aperture Radar Systems , 1962, IRE Transactions on Military Electronics.

[3]  G. Trahey,et al.  Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities. II. Effects of and correction for motion , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Effective and versatile software beamformation toolbox , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  W. Brown.  Synthetic Aperture Radar , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  John C. Curlander,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing , 1991 .

[7]  G.E. Trahey,et al.  Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities. I. Basic principles , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  G.R. Lockwood,et al.  Theoretical assessment of a synthetic aperture beamformer for real-time 3-D imaging , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Svetoslav Ivanov Nikolov,et al.  Virtual ultrasound sources in high-resolution ultrasound imaging , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Adaptive multi-element synthetic aperture imaging with motion and phase aberration correction , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  G. Kino,et al.  Real-Time Digital Image Reconstruction: A Description of Imaging Hardware and an Analysis of Quantization Errors , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[12]  W.D. O'Brien,et al.  Synthetic aperture techniques with a virtual source element , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  K-space model of motion artifacts in synthetic transmit ultrasound imaging , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[14]  M. Bae,et al.  A study of synthetic-aperture imaging with virtual source elements in B-mode ultrasound imaging systems. , 2000, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[15]  J. Jensen,et al.  Multielement synthetic transmit aperture imaging using temporal encoding , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Motion estimation using common spatial frequencies in synthetic aperture imaging , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[17]  J. A. Jensen,et al.  Recursive ultrasound imaging , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[18]  Tai-Kyong Song,et al.  Effects and limitations of motion compensation in synthetic aperture techniques , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[19]  G.R. Lockwood,et al.  Real-time 3-D ultrasound imaging using sparse synthetic aperture beamforming , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  J. Arendt Jensen,et al.  Duplex synthetic aperture imaging with tissue motion compensation , 2003 .

[21]  H. Ermert,et al.  A 100-MHz ultrasound imaging system for dermatologic and ophthalmologic diagnostics , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  H. Ermert,et al.  Ultrasound synthetic aperture imaging: monostatic approach , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Efficient synthetic aperture imaging from a circular aperture with possible application to catheter-based imaging , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging for small scale systems , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  J. Arendt.  Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[27]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Sparse array imaging with spatially-encoded transmits , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[28]  J. Kortbek,et al.  P2B-1 Synthetic Aperture Focusing Applied to Imaging Using a Rotating Single Element Transducer , 2007, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[29]  Kim L Gammelmark,et al.  In-vivo evaluation of convex array synthetic aperture imaging. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  G.R. Lockwood,et al.  Effects of motion on a synthetic aperture beamformer for real-time 3D ultrasound , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[31]  Jørgen Arendt,et al.  K-space model of motion artifacts in synthetic transmit aperture ultrasound imaging , .

[32]  E. Leith,et al.  A High-Resolution Radar Combat-Surveillance System , 1961, IRE Transactions on Military Electronics.

[33]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[34]  J.A. Jensen,et al.  Effects Influencing Focusing in Synthetic Aperture Vector Flow Imaging , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.